healthcarereimagined

Envisioning healthcare for the 21st century

  • About
  • Economics

From information war to emerging tech: new IC strategy centers ‘competition’ with China, Russia

Posted by timmreardon on 08/12/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.

By Theresa Hitchens on August 11, 2023 at 12:59 PM

WASHINGTON — Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines on Thursday released the 2023 National Intelligence Strategy (NIS), focusing on “strategic competition” with China and Russia across the economic, political and military spheres — and calling on the Intelligence Communityto up its game on everything from information warfare to supply chain control to rapid adoption of emerging technologies.

“The United States faces an increasingly complex and interconnected threat environment characterized by strategic competition between the United States, the People’s Republic of China (PRC), and the Russian Federation, felt perhaps most immediately in Russia’s ongoing aggression in Ukraine. In addition to states, sub-national and non-state actors—from multinational corporations to transnational social movements—are increasingly able to create influence, compete for information, and secure or deny political and security outcomes, which provides opportunities for new partnerships as well as new challenges to U.S. interests,” Haines writes in a forward to the document.

“In addition, shared global challenges, including climate change, human and health security, as well as emerging and disruptive technological advances, are converging in ways that produce significant consequences that are often difficult to predict,” she added.

The NIS “is a foundational document for the IC and reflects the input of leaders from each of the 18 intelligence elements, as it directs the operations, investments, and priorities of the collective,” explains the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) in a press release announcing the new strategy.

Besides the usual three-letter IC agiencis, those 18 organizations include the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the intelligence arms of the military service, with the most recent addition being the Space Force in early 2021.

The document lays out six goals for the interagency community:

  1. Position the IC for Intensifying Strategic Competition: This includes improving the “ability to provide timely and accurate insights into competitor intentions, capabilities, and actions by strengthening capabilities in language, technical, and cultural expertise and harnessing open source, ‘big data,’ artificial intelligence, and advanced analytics.”
  2. Recruit, Develop, and Retain a Talented and Diverse Workforce that Operates as a United Community: The IC needs an increasingly technical and diverse workforce, the document says. “The Community must overcome long-standing cultural, structural, bureaucratic, technical, and security challenges to reimagine and deliver the IC workforce of the future.”
  3. Deliver Interoperable and Innovative Solutions at Scale: To do so, the strategy says, the IC must establish “unified IC procurement authorities, centralized solicitation systems, and a Community-wide contracting system, all bolstered by automation tools. A Community-wide, data-centric approach based on common standards is crucial to realizing the full promise of new capabilities.”
  4. Diversify, Expand, and Strengthen Partnerships: “Even as we continue to invest in existing partnerships like those with our Five-Eyes partnersand forge new ones, the evolving set of challenges — from cyberattacks and climate change to pandemics and foreign malign influence — also require investing in new and more diverse partnerships, especially with non-state and sub-national actors. From companies to cities to civil society organizations, these actors’ ideas, innovations, resources, and actions increasingly shape our societal, technological, and economic futures.”
  5. Expand IC Capabilities and Expertise on Transnational Challenges: Such challenges, the NIS explains, include “more frequent and intense crises due to the effects of climate change, narcotics trafficking, financial crises, supply chain disruptions, corruption, new and recurring diseases, and emerging and disruptive technologies” that in turn are piquing security crises such as civil unrest and migration.
  6. Enhance Resilience: This includes increasing the IC’s role in protecting critical infrastructure to improve early warning that can allow more robust “recovery and response,” as well as “expanding its role in understanding threats and vulnerabilities to supply chains and helping to mitigate threats to government and industry partners’ infrastructure.”

Article link: https://breakingdefense-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/breakingdefense.com/2023/08/from-information-war-to-emerging-tech-new-ic-strategy-centers-competition-with-china-russia/?amp=1

Pentagon memo aims to leverage $9B JWCC ‘to greatest extent possible’: Official – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 08/10/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.

By Jaspreet Gill on August 09, 2023 at 12:10 PM

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon’s latest memorandum on its Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC) aims to “lay out the conditions” for how the entire department and military services can leverage the contract “to the greatest extent possible,” according to an official from the Defense Department’s chief information office (CIO).

“So now we really are in a place where we need to make sure that we look at our entire cloud landscape, rationalize our cloud landscape, enable the military departments to make sure that they continue to use their platforms to optimize cloud,” Lily Zeleke, deputy CIO for information enterprise, said at a Defense One Cloud Workshop event on Tuesday.

“However, we want to make sure that JWCC is the prime and optimal contract that we’ve put in place,” she continued. “So the guidance is going to enable that and enable rationalization as well.”

The $9 billion JWCC contract is a multi-vendor, multi-cloud follow-up to the infamous single-source failed Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) contract, which was canceled in 2021. The new venture is envisioned as DoD’s premier computing contract and is meant to provide the department “with enterprise-wide, globally available cloud services across all security domains and classification levels, from the strategic level to the tactical edge.”

Last December, the Pentagon awardedGoogle, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft and Oracle all spots on the JWCC contract to build out its key military cloud computing backbone. And then this March, all four vendors won their first task orders under the contract. 

But since the project’s inception it’s been unclear if or how individual departments or military services are meant to — or mandated to — use JWCC versus their own cloud options.

The memo [PDF], released publicly on Aug. 2, aimed to provide some clarity and said all Office of the Secretary of Defense components and “defense agencies and field activities” (DAFAs) should use JWCC “for all available offerings to procure future enterprise cloud computing capabilities and services.” 

“All cloud capabilities and services currently under contract in OSD Components and DAFAs will transition to the JWCC vehicle upon expiration of their current period of performance,” according to the memo.

Military services (MILDEPs) and combatant commands (COCOMS) are also tasked with using JWCC “for all available offerings for any new cloud computing capabilities and services at the Secret (Impact Level 6) or Top Secret, including all tactical edge and Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS) cloud computing capabilities and services.”

However, the memo also notes that the MILDEPs and COCOMs still can leverage other vehicles besides JWCC to procure other cloud capabilities, effectively not mandating the use of JWCC.

“While not mandating JWCC use for all cloud capabilities and services, DoD CIO will encourage MILDEPs and CCMDs to consider use of JWCC for their needs, especially as trends from OSD Component and DAFA-use provide additional data points in the coming year on price competitiveness and mission efficacy,” according to the memo.

In January, DoD Chief Information Officer John Sherman first revealed to Breaking Defense that his office was developing a memorandum to “rationalize” JWCC. The intent wasn’t to override individual cloud efforts from the military services, but Sherman’s vision would have effectively set JWCC as the primary cloud option that would serve as the “absolute foundation” for the Pentagon’s sprawling Joint All Domain Command and Control effort. 

EXCLUSIVE: New DoD Guidance Will Prioritize Joint Cloud, Ensure ‘Cloud Rationalization’

“I’m not gonna do anything capriciously or just with a sledgehammer here,” he said then. “This will be with a surgical knife about where things need to go, and… if I was my boss, I would expect the CIO to be doing this and make sure the government is getting the best value for our dollar and the very best mission outcome. And that’s why rather than just let this kind of run on autopilot, there is going to be some guidance about how this works.”

Speaking at the Defense One event, Zeleke said additional JWCC task orders are in the pipeline right now and that the new memorandum will kickstart a new governance council for JWCC, though that isn’t meant to function “like the gavel and we’re sitting at the head of the table.”

“No, it really means that we have the mechanism to make not just the users and the components accountable, but us as DoD CIO, and [Defense Information Systems Agency] as the service arm and the program office for JWCC — all of us across the board from an acquisition standpoint, from a technical standpoint, from processes standpoint — accountable,” she said. 

According to the memo, the governance council, now called the DoD Information Enterprise Portfolio Management, Modernization and Capabilities Council, will provide a “broader forum to continue with existing and expanding digital modernization activities relevant to the Department’s information enterprise, including the current and future cloud initiatives as well as contractual efforts, and review of procurement administrative lead time for cloud initiatives.”

The council will include members from DoD components and agencies, the memo says.

Article link: https://breakingdefense-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/breakingdefense.com/2023/08/pentagon-memo-aims-to-leverage-9b-jwcc-to-greatest-extent-possible-official/?amp=1

White House and DARPA challenge innovators to bring AI tools to cyber defense – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 08/09/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.

By ALEXANDRA KELLEYAUGUST 9, 2023 02:05 PM ET

The AI Cyber Challenge asks leading companies to develop advanced AI systems that will contribute to critical infrastructure cybersecurity — with nearly $20 million available in prizes.

In the latest step towards harnessing the power of artificial intelligence for public good, the Biden administration is launching a new, two-year competition between some of the leading AI software companies to develop new code to protect the digital networks of critical infrastructures nationwide. 

Led by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the “AI Cyber Challenge” competition partners with companies — including Google, Microsoft, Anthropic and OpenAI — to leverage advanced AI algorithmic capabilities for national cybersecurity.

The prizes for this competition total about $20 million, and will be awarded to the teams with the best systems.

“AI is the most powerful technology of our time, and we have to get it right for the American people,” Arati Prabharker, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, told reporters on Tuesday. “That means managing its risks and it means harnessing its tremendous potential.”

Prabharker added that this is a pivotal example of how the public and private sectors can collaborate on national security projects for mutual benefit. Ann Neuberger, the deputy national security advisor for cyber and emerging technology, added this challenge is “critical” and marries automatic software security with AI to quickly identify and remedy network vulnerabilities.

“With this new challenge, teams will now have the power of modern AI to work through these complicated problems in support of our national security,” she said. “This challenge will help us stay ahead in the race against our adversaries’ cyber offensive capabilities. Because fundamentally, there is no national security without cybersecurity.”

While the competition involves larger tech firms, DARPA will also fund seven small businesses with up to $1 million to participate in the competition’s initial phase. Perri Adams, the DARPA program manager for the AI Cyber Challenge, confirmed that the qualifying event will take place in spring 2024, with the top 20 candidates participating.

From there, the remaining top five semi-finalists will be chosen to participate in the final competition at DEFCON in 2025.

“This is a chance to explore what’s possible when experts in cybersecurity and AI have access to a suite of cross-company resources of combined, unprecedented caliber,” Adams said. 

The AICC will collaborate with the Open Source Security Foundation, the latter of whom will serve as a challenge advisor. Adams said the collaboration is due to the importance of open source software’s role in the democratization of cybersecurity.

“AICC will also ask the prize winners to open source their system such that the innovations produced by AICC can be used by everyone, from volunteer open source developers to commercial industry,” Adams said. “If we’re successful, I hope to see AICC not only produce the next generation of cybersecurity tools in this space, but show how AI can be used to better society.”

A priority for this challenge will be keeping the winning software products agnostic to all sectors and applicable to a large swath of digital networks. 

“We’re trying to design tools that can secure as much software as possible throughout society,” a DARPA official said on Tuesday’s press call. 

President Joe Biden has focused his executive efforts on cultivating a level of public and private partnerships amid the growing — and unregulated — anthropomorphic AI industry. With participation from agencies like the National Institute of Security and Technology, Biden has put forward several guidance documents like the AI Bill of Rights and AI Risk Management Framework to bring more oversight and accountability into AI systems. 

Moving forward, Biden has said he will continue working with Congress to push bipartisan regulations forward, as well as release an executive order on responsible AI innovation.

Article link: https://www.nextgov.com/artificial-intelligence/2023/08/white-house-and-darpa-challenge-innovators-bring-ai-tools-cyber-defense/389265/

NIST Case Study on Need for Standards

Posted by timmreardon on 08/09/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.

A case study for you: The Great Baltimore Fire of 1904 serves as a disastrous example of the need for standards.

Starting on a quiet Sunday morning, the fire spread quickly and overwhelmed the city’s ability to fight it alone. Fire companies from nearby states rushed in to help with more than enough water and people to fight the flames … but with fire hoses that didn’t fit the hydrants.

Ultimately, the fire burned for more than a day and destroyed 1,500 buildings.

More than 600 variations in firehose fittings existed across the U.S., according to a NIST study issued in 1914. That’s why NIST worked with the NFPA to usher in a national standard for fire hydrant connections.

Standards are everywhere if you look for them. See the world around you in a new light with this explainer: https://lnkd.in/gKAk4QN4

Standards #FireSafety #History

Article link: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nist_standards-firesafety-history-activity-7093970979139305473-bq4h?

Pope Warns Artificial Intelligence Could ‘Fuel Conflicts And Antagonism’ – Forbes

Posted by timmreardon on 08/09/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.

TOPLINE

Pope Francis issued a warning against artificial intelligence Tuesday, saying in a statement it should be used in “service of humanity” and warning to be vigilant of the “rapidly increasing impact” the technology is having on society.

KEY FACTS

The Vatican released the statement to announce the theme of the next World Day of Peace of the Catholic Church—“artificial intelligence and peace”—which is on New Year’s Day; last year’s theme was “combatting Covid-19 together.”

The Pope called for “an open dialogue on the meaning of these new technologies, endowed with disruptive possibilities and ambivalent effects” and said there is an “urgent need to orient” the use of AI in a responsible way so as to avoid “conflicts and antagonism.”

He said in the statement that AI must be used ethically in the specific fields of education and law, and that the development of the technology shouldn’t come “at the expense of the most fragile and excluded.”

Pope Francis, 86, has said in the past he doesn’t know how to use a computer, though he has been praised as one of the more technologically advanced popes as he’s hosted multiple events online and has an active X, formerly Twitter, account.

SURPRISING FACT

Earlier this year, Pope Francis was the subject of many AI-generated photos. The New York Times reported that AI-generated images of Pope Francis had more likes and comments than many other AI photos. A “deepfake” series of Pope Francis wearing a Balenciaga coat went viral, and other fake images of him eating fast food, playing guitar and scuba diving also started to circulate the internet.

KEY BACKGROUND

AI and its various developments and uses became a worldwide conversation seemingly overnight after the launch of ChatGPT last November. Since then, concerns about its uses and impacts—especially going into an election year—have permeated conversations as lawmakers in the U.S. and abroaddiscuss how to regulate the new technology. In March, Elon Musk and hundreds of other high-profile technologists, entrepreneurs and researchers called on AI labs to stop work on their systems and urged developers to step back from development while society better assess the risks advanced artificial intelligence poses to humanity. Even Geoffrey Hinton, nicknamed the godfather of AI, left his role at Google to spread word about how AI could soon outperform humans and the dangerous advancements ahead. Pope Francis—who has been called innovative in his role leading the Catholic Church—has spoken about AI and technology in the past with similar messages. Five months ago, he said he was “convinced” the development of the technology and machine learning “has the potential to contribute in a positive way to the future of humanity,” though he cautioned that for positive developments to happen the people creating it need to “act ethically and responsibly.” In February, he warned against technology more broadly, saying it cannot “replace human contact.”

Article link: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mollybohannon/2023/08/08/pope-warns-artificial-intelligence-could-fuel-conflicts-and-antagonism/

Truth Decay and National Security – RAND

Posted by timmreardon on 08/08/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.


by Heather J. Williams and Caitlin McCulloch

August 1, 2023

The line between fact and opinion in public discourse has been eroding, and with it the public’s ability to have arguments and find common ground based in fact. We at RAND call this diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life “Truth Decay.” Everyone can feel how it affects their day-to-day lives—the family member who has fallen down a QAnon rabbit hole, avoiding discussing current affairs with a neighbor, or the fractious discourse on a television program. But this phenomenon is also degrading U.S. national security, in ways more difficult to observe.

Five years ago, RAND published a seminal document describing Truth Decay, and former President Obama put it on his summer reading list. Since then, our RAND colleagues have examined the intersections of Truth Decay with media literacy, individual resistance, and vaccine hesitancy. In our new report, we examine this phenomenon specifically in the context of national security, finding that Truth Decay adversely affects the day-to-day business of national security and major decisionmaking at every level.

Two core drivers of Truth Decay are political polarization and the spread of misinformation—and these are particularly intertwined in the national security arena. Exposure to misinformation leads to increased polarization, and increased polarization decreases the impact of factual information. Individuals, institutions, and the nation as a whole are vulnerable to this vicious cycle.

Exposure to misinformation leads to increased polarization, and increased polarization decreases the impact of factual information. Share on Twitter

National security and foreign policy were, historically, areas somewhat protected from politicization. Politicians and foreign policy professionals were seen as driving the international agenda without much input from domestic audiences, and U.S. foreign policy tended not to fluctuate dramatically from one presidential administration to the next. Over the past two decades, however, popular disillusionment with the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, in conjunction with the rise of political movements that espoused a virulent nationalism, has weakened the bipartisan consensus on U.S. foreign policy.

Today, it is better understood that the general public has its own opinions on national security and foreign policy issues. This means, however, that a negative cycle of polarization and Truth Decay can easily take hold. Opinions are shaped by the social cues that the public picks up, such as what is said by a trusted political leader, a military leader, or close peers. Extreme partisanship intensifies the effect: People confidently adhere to views endorsed by their party and ignore any contrary facts.

So polarization makes what leaders say more potent. And politicians are, by tradition, if not by nature, selective in the information they present. Put more bluntly, politicians lie. So just as it is hard to parse fact from opinion in today’s information environment, it is also difficult to discern when politicians are knowingly lying and when they are deceiving themselves. Put all of this into the blender with social media and the 24-hour news cycle, and leaders can spread shameless lies rapidly across the globe.

The fractured media environment further pushes foreign policy opinions to extremes. For example, Pew Research has found that both Republicans and Democrats who, respectively, chose right- or left-leaning “news bubbles” held more negative views of China than others in their own parties.

Even if the U.S. national security apparatus—from civil servants to military service members, who are supposed to hold values like trust and stewardship (PDF) as core to their ethical code—can operate entirely outside of politics, it remains exposed to the effects of Truth Decay. Take intelligence work. In an ideal world, intelligence agencies collect information, assess it for its reliability, and provide it to policymakers without bias or agenda. Members of the intelligence community are respected for their expertise and professionalism and how, to the best of their abilities, they are able to discern what are the facts.

Truth Decay impedes this process in several critical ways. It makes it more difficult for intelligence analysts to perform the core function of their job, collecting and analyzing data. Just as it is hard for ordinary civilians to filter through the increasing volume of opinion to find the facts, so too do national security officials grapple with the challenge, with lots of room for improvement.

Truth Decay also increases the risk that policymakers do not trust or use intelligence community assessments. The United States spends over $80 billion a year on its intelligence apparatus—and that’s money well spent only if policymakers choose to use it. Policymakers are not equal consumers of intelligence; some rely heavily on the intelligence community’s assessments, while others barely cash in on their security clearances, particularly in Congress. If intelligence analyses were our daily vegetables, you could say that we pay to grow them, harvest them, prepare them, and plate them, but nobody is required to eat them. If policymakers lack trust in factual information, or analysis based on factual information, that can lead to national security policies that are based instead on opinion or, worse, conspiracy theory or misinformation possibly manufactured by the nation’s adversaries.

The intelligence community is also an interesting example because of how it has been pulled into public dialogue on foreign policy more often in recent decades. The intelligence community has gone from the shadows—remember that the existence of the National Security Agency, nicknamed “No Such Agency,” was a state secret from 1952 to 1975—to high-profile intelligence failures (PDF) in the early 2000s. In the past decade, policymakers have pushed the intelligence community to establish the facts publicly on issues like the origins of the coronavirus pandemic (PDF) and the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17.

Paradoxically, this can result in intelligence agencies being undermined and attacked in the public sphere by decisionmakers. This was particularly evident in 2017 with the public release of portions of the intelligence community’s assessment (PDF) on Russian interference in the 2016 presidential elections, which eventually received bipartisan support, but only after direct questioning of the underlying analytical tradecraft, consistent challenging, and significant suspicion from political leaders. Clearly, national security institutions are being used to counter Truth Decay, but their credibility gets eroded by the phenomenon at the same time.

In our report, we anticipate other ways in which Truth Decay can negatively affect the intelligence community and the military in recruiting and retaining the nation’s best talent. As we mention, Truth Decay affects us at the national and international levels, directly impacting our allies and our relationships with them. Though experts debate the degree to which credibility is important in maintaining alliances, they agree it is a relevant factor. Perceptions that U.S. leaders are not speaking honestly or that U.S. assurances cannot be trusted diminish that credibility. Research shows that domestic accountability is key to the credibility of leadership in foreign policy. Former President Trump, in particular, who relied heavily on opinion rather than fact, was seen with little confidence globally, especially among the United States’ European Union allies. Allies depend on U.S. intelligence and military collaboration, and weakening those institutions undermines the value of that cooperation. Further, the same trends of politicization and misinformation that undermine U.S. national security erode allies’ national security.

Meanwhile, the United States’ adversaries are less vulnerable to the negative impacts of these drivers. Populations in Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea do not expect honesty from their governments, so their leaders’ embrace of misinformation or denial of facts do not similarly erode the social contract. These states have long existed in a post-truth society. Russians describe lying as a national pastime. Most recently, Russia has weaponized false narratives about the “Nazification” of Ukraine to justify its illegal invasion and is cultivating a young generation of nationalist zealots. The United States’ greater vulnerability to Truth Decay makes this a lever that adversaries can play upon, incentivizing them to push the United States further into polarization and to spread more misinformation in the public.

The United States’ greater vulnerability to Truth Decay makes this a lever that adversaries can play upon.Share on Twitter

We found that little work is being done to understand how severe the impact of Truth Decay is on national security and, more importantly, how to mitigate it. Media literacy workshops, classes, and messaging may help, although the research literature shows that their effectiveness is mixed. Legal institutions can play a positive role here, by raising the penaltiesfor those who spread harmful false information when that speech specifically threatens or terrifies others. The U.S. system, however, is uniquely protective of speech, so social and political norms play a greater role in countering Truth Decay. Political figures could use their podiums to frame factual information as nonpartisan in order to stall or slow the polarization–Truth Decay cycle. At the same time, the bipartisan January 6 select committee, which spent 18 months interviewing over a thousand people and reviewing countless documents before releasing an 845-page final report (PDF), does not seem to have corrected false opinions that voter fraud changed the outcome of the 2020 election or opinions about President Trump’s role in the events of the January 6 insurrection—suggesting that there are limits to the impact of traditional political mechanisms at truth-finding.

It is particularly important to promote the credibility of the United States’ national security and intelligence systems. Such institutions, once damaged, are not easily rebuilt. Government agencies, private-sector organizations, the media, and nonprofit groups all have a role to play. These efforts do not necessarily need to be coordinated, but they all need to be more robust to stay the pervasive negative effects of Truth Decay.


Heather J. Williams is a senior policy researcher at the RAND Corporation and associate director of the International Security and Defense Policy Program. Caitlin McCulloch is an associate political scientist at RAND. 

This commentary originally appeared on Lawfare on August 1, 2023. Commentary gives RAND researchers a platform to convey insights based on their professional expertise and often on their peer-reviewed research and analysis.

Article link: https://www.rand.org/blog/2023/08/truth-decay-and-national-security.html?

DISA launches OCONUS Cloud capability

Posted by timmreardon on 08/08/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.

By the DISA Hosting and Compute Center

The Defense Information Systems Agency Hosting and Compute Center’s OCONUS Cloud aims to create a global fabric that will connect on-the-ground teams to each other, to headquarters, and to private and public cloud networks.

A beta program for OCONUS Region for Stratus is currently available at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. Customers interested in participating in the beta program for OCONUS Region for Stratus may email the Hybrid Cloud Broker.

OCONUS Region for Stratus is just one element in DISA’s plan to bring OCONUS Cloud to the United States Department of Defense. DISA HaCC is also partnering with the Office of the DoD Chief Information Officer and U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) to launch the Joint Operational Edge initiative.

JOE is an interconnected and integrated mesh of large form factor edge computing platforms, installed on-premises at DOD locations, that delivers commercial Infrastructure as a Service and Platform as a Service, as well as the necessary DOD enterprise common service offerings. JOE will provide compute offerings that may be ordered under the Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability contract.

To learn more about OCONUS Region for Stratus, or to join the waitlist for future OCONUS Cloud capabilities, contact the Hybrid Cloud Broker.

Visit DISA.mil for more agency news and updates.

Article link: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/disa-launches-oconus-cloud-capability

Cross-Silo Leadership – HBR

Posted by timmreardon on 08/08/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.
  • Amy C. Edmondson,
  • Sujin Jang,
  • Tiziana Casciaro

From the Magazine (May–June 2019)

Summary

Today the most promising innovation and business opportunities require collaboration among functions, offices, and organizations. To realize them, companies must break down silos and get people working together across boundaries. But that’s a challenge for many leaders. Employees naturally default to focusing on vertical relationships, and formal restructuring is costly, confusing, and slow. What, then, is the solution? Engaging in four activities that promote horizontal teamwork: (1) developing cultural brokers, or employees who excel at connecting across divides; (2) encouraging people to ask questions in an open-ended, unbiased way that genuinely explores others’ thinking; (3) getting people to actively take other points of view; and (4) broadening employees’ vision to include more-distant networks.

By supporting these activities, leaders can help employees connect with new pools of expertise and learn from and relate to people who think very differently from them. And when that happens, interface collaboration will become second nature.

Though most executives recognize the importance of breaking down silos to help people collaborate across boundaries, they struggle to make it happen. That’s understandable: It is devilishly difficult. Think about your own relationships at work—the people you report to and those who report to you, for starters. Now consider the people in other functions, units, or geographies whose work touches yours in some way. Which relationships get prioritized in your day-to-day job?

We’ve posed that question to managers, engineers, salespeople, and consultants in companies around the world. The response we get is almost always the same: vertical relationships.

But when we ask, “Which relationships are most important for creating value for customers?” the answers flip. Today the vast majority of innovation and business-development opportunities lie in the interfaces between functions, offices, or organizations. In short, the integrated solutions that most customers want—but companies wrestle with developing—require horizontal collaboration.

The value of horizontal teamwork is widely recognized. Employees who can reach outside their silos to find colleagues with complementary expertise learn more, sell more, and gain skillsfaster. Harvard’s Heidi Gardner has found that firms with more cross-boundary collaboration achieve greater customer loyalty and higher margins. As innovation hinges more and more on interdisciplinary cooperation, digitalization transforms business at a breakneck pace, and globalization increasingly requires people to work across national borders, the demand for executives who can lead projects at interfaces keeps rising.

Our research and consulting work with hundreds of executives and managers in dozens of organizations confirms both the need for and the challenge of horizontal collaboration. “There’s no doubt. We should focus on big projects that call for integration across practices,” a partner in a global accounting firm told us. “That’s where our greatest distinctive value is developed. But most of us confine ourselves to the smaller projects that we can handle within our practice areas. It’s frustrating.” A senior partner in a leading consulting firm put it slightly differently: “You know you should swim farther to catch a bigger fish, but it is a lot easier to swim in your own pond and catch a bunch of small fish.”

One way to break down silos is to redesign the formal organizational structure. But that approach has limits: It’s costly, confusing, and slow. Worse, every new structure solves some problems but creates others. That’s why we’ve focused on identifying activities that facilitate boundary crossing. We’ve found that people can be trained to see and connect with pools of expertise throughout their organizations and to work better with colleagues who think very differently from them. The core challenges of operating effectively at interfaces are simple: learningabout people on the other side and relating to them. But simple does not mean easy; human beings have always struggled to understand and relate to those who are different.

Leaders need to help people develop the capacity to overcome these challenges on both individual and organizational levels. That means providing training in and support for four practices that enable effective interface work.

1. Develop and Deploy Cultural Brokers

Fortunately, in most companies there are people who already excel at interface collaboration. They usually have experiences and relationships that span multiple sectors, functions, or domains and informally serve as links between them. We call these people cultural brokers. In studies involving more than 2,000 global teams, one of us—Sujin—found that diverse teams containing a cultural broker significantly outperformed diverse teams without one. (See “The Most Creative Teams Have a Specific Type of Cultural Diversity,”HBR.org, July 24, 2018.) Companies should identify these individuals and help them increase their impact.

Cultural brokers promote cross-boundary work in one of two ways: by acting as a bridge or as an adhesive.

A bridge offers himself as a go-between, allowing people in different functions or geographies to collaborate with minimal disruption to their day-to-day routine. Bridges are most effective when they have considerable knowledge of both sides and can figure out what each one needs. This is why the champagne and spirits distributor Moët Hennessy España hired two enologists, or wine experts, to help coordinate the work of its marketing and sales groups, which had a history of miscommunication and conflict. The enologists could relate to both groups equally: They could speak to marketers about the emotional content (the ephemeral “bouquet”) of brands, while also providing pragmatic salespeople with details on the distinctive features of products they needed to win over retailers. Understanding both worlds, the enologists were able to communicate the rationale for each group’s modus operandi to the other, allowing marketing and sales to work more synergistically even without directly interacting. This kind of cultural brokerage is efficient because it lets disparate parties work around differences without investing in learning the other side’s perspective or changing how they work. It’s especially valuable for one-off collaborations or when the company is under intense time pressure to deliver results.

Employees who can reach outside their silos learn more and sell more.

Adhesives, in contrast, bring people together and help build mutual understanding and lasting relationships. Take one manager we spoke with at National Instruments, a global producer of automated test equipment. He frequently connects colleagues from different regions and functions. “I think of it as building up the relationships between them,” he told us. “If a colleague needs to work with someone in another office or function, I would tell them, ‘OK, here’s the person to call.’ Then I’d take the time to sit down and say, ‘Well, let me tell you a little bit about how these guys work.’” Adhesives facilitate collaboration by vouching for people and helping them decipher one another’s language. Unlike bridges, adhesives develop others’ capacity to work across a boundary in the future without their assistance.

Company leaders can build both bridging and adhesive capabilities in their organizations by hiring people with multifunctional or multicultural backgrounds who have the strong interpersonal skills needed to build rapport with multiple parties. Because it takes resilience to work with people across cultural divides, firms should also look for a growth mindset—the desire to learn and to take on challenges and “stretch” opportunities.

In addition, leaders can develop more brokers by giving people at all levels the chance to move into roles that expose them to multiple parts of the company. This, by the way, is good training for general managers and is what many rotational leadership-development programs aim to accomplish. Claudine Wolfe, the head of talent and development at the global insurer Chubb, maintains that the company’s capacity to serve customers around the world rests on giving top performers opportunities to work in different geographies and cultivate an international mindset. “We give people their critical development experiences steeped in the job, in the region,” she says. “They get coaching in the cultural norms and the language, but then they live it and internalize it. They go to the local bodega, take notice of the products on the shelves, have conversations with the merchant, and learn what it really means to live in that environment.”

Matrix organizational structures, in which people report to two (or more) groups, can also help develop cultural brokers. Despite their inherent challenges (they can be infuriatingly hard to navigate without strong leadership and accountability), matrices get people used to operating at interfaces.

We’re not saying that everyone in your organization needs to be a full-fledged cultural broker. But consciously expanding the ranks of brokers and deploying them to grease the wheels of collaboration can go a long way.

2. Encourage People to Ask the Right Questions

It’s nearly impossible to work across boundaries without asking a lot of questions. Inquiry is critical because what we see and take for granted on one side of an interface is not the same as what people experience on the other side.

Indeed, a study of more than 1,000 middle managers at a large bank that Tiziana conducted with Bill McEvily and Evelyn Zhang of the University of Toronto and Francesca Gino of Harvard Business School highlights the value of inquisitiveness in boundary-crossing work. It showed that managers with high levels of curiosity were more likely to build networks that spanned disconnected parts of the company.

But all of us are vulnerable to forgetting the crucial practice of asking questions as we move up the ladder. High-achieving people in particular frequently fail to wonder what others are seeing. Worse, when we do recognize that we don’t know something, we may avoid asking a question out of (misguided) fear that it will make us look incompetent or weak. “Not asking questions is a big mistake many professionals make,” Norma Kraay, the managing partner of talent for Deloitte Canada, told us. “Expert advisers want to offer a solution. That’s what they’re trained to do.”

Leaders can encourage inquiry in two important ways—and in the process help create an organization where it’s psychologically safe to ask questions.

Be a role model.

When leaders show interest in what others are seeing and thinking by asking questions, it has a stunning effect: It prompts people in their organizations to do the same.

Asking questions also conveys the humility that more and more business leaders and researchers are pointing to as vital to success. According to Laszlo Bock, Google’s former senior vice president of people operations, humble people are better at bringing others together to solve tough problems. In a fast-changing business environment, humility—not to be confused with false modesty—is simply a strength. Its power comes from realism (as in It really is a complex, challenging world out there; if we don’t work together, we don’t stand a chance).

Gino says one way a leader can make employees feel comfortable asking questions is by openly acknowledging when he or she doesn’t know the answer. Another, she says, is by having days in which employees are explicitly encouraged to ask “Why?” “What if…?” and “How might we…?” (See “The Business Case for Curiosity,”HBR, September–October 2018.)

Teach employees the art of inquiry.

Training can help expand the range and frequency of questions employees ask and, according to Hal Gregersen of the MIT Leadership Center, can reinvigorate their sense of curiosity. But some questions are better than others. And if you simply tell people to raise more questions, you might unleash interrogation tactics that inhibit rather than encourage the development of new perspectives. As MIT’s Edgar Schein explains in his book Humble Inquiry,questions are the secret to productive work relationships—but they must be driven by genuine interest in understanding another’s view.

How to Ask Good Questions

COMMON PITFALLSEFFECTIVE INQUIRY

Start with yes-or-no questions.Start with open-ended questions that minimize preconceptions. (“How are things going on your end?” “What does your group see as the key opportunity in this space?”)Continue asking overly general questions (“What’s on your mind?”) that may invite long off-point responses.As collaborations develop, ask questions that focus on specific issues but allow people plenty of room to elaborate. (“What do you know about x?” “Can you explain how that works?”)Assume that you’ve grasped what speakers intended.Check your understanding by summarizing what you’re hearing and asking explicitly for corrections or missing elements. (“Does that sound right—am I missing anything?” “Can you help me fill in the gaps?”)Assume the collaboration process will take care of itself.Periodically take time to inquire into others’ experiences of the process or relationship. (“How do you think the project is going?” “What could we do to work together more effectively?”)

It’s also important to learn how to request information in the least biased way possible. This means asking open-ended questions that minimize preconceptions, rather than yes-or-no questions. For instance, “What do you see as the key opportunity in this space?” will generate a richer dialogue than “Do you think this is the right opportunity to pursue?”

As collaborations move forward, it’s helpful for team leaders or project managers to raise queries that encourage others to dive more deeply into specific issues and express related ideas or experiences. “What do you know about x?” and “Can you explain how that works?” are two examples. These questions are focused but neither limit responses nor invite long discourses that stray too far from the issue at hand.

How you process the answers also matters. It’s natural, as conversations unfold, to assume you understand what’s being said. But what people hear is biased by their expertise and experiences. So it’s important to train people to check whether they’re truly getting their colleagues’ meaning, by using language like “This is what I’m hearing—did I miss anything?” or “Can you help me fill in the gaps?” or “I think what you said means the project is on track. Is that correct?”

Finally, periodic temperature taking is needed to examine the collaborative process itself. The only way to find out how others are experiencing a project or relationship is by asking questions such as “How do you think the project is going?” and “What could we do to work together more effectively?”

3. Get People to See the World Through Others’ Eyes

Leaders shouldn’t just encourage employees to be curious about different groups and ask questions about their thinking and practices; they should also urge their people to actively consider others’ points of view. People from different organizational groups don’t see things the same way. Studies (including research on barriers to successful product innovation that the management professor Deborah Dougherty conducted at Wharton) consistently reveal that this leads to misunderstandings in interface work. It’s vital, therefore, to help people learn how to take the perspectives of others. One of us, Amy, has done research showing that ambitious cross-industry innovation projects succeed when diverse participants discover how to do this. New Songdo, a project to build a city from scratch in South Korea that launched a decade ago, provides an instructive example. Early in the effort, project leaders brought together architects, engineers, planners, and environmental experts and helped them integrate their expertise in a carefully crafted learning process designed to break down barriers between disciplines. Today, in striking contrast to other “smart” city projects, New Songdo is 50% complete and has 30,000 residents, 33,000 jobs, and emissions that are 70% lower than those of other developments its size.

In a study of jazz bands and Broadway productions, Brian Uzzi of Northwestern University foundthat leaders of successful teams had an unusual ability to assume other people’s viewpoints. These leaders could speak the multiple “languages” of their teammates. Other research has shown that when members of a diverse team proactively take the perspectives of others, it enhances the positive effect of information sharing and increases the team’s creativity.

Creating a culture that fosters this kind of behavior is a senior leadership responsibility. Psychological research suggests that while most people are capableof taking others’ perspectives, they are rarely motivated to do so. Leaders can provide some motivation by emphasizing to their teams how much the integration of diverse expertise enhances new value creation. But a couple of other tactics will help:

Organize cross-silo dialogues.

Instead of holding one-way information sessions, leaders should set up cross-silo discussions that help employees see the world through the eyes of customers or colleagues in other parts of the company. The goal is to get everyone to share knowledge and work on synthesizing that diverse input into new solutions. This happens best in face-to-face meetings that are carefully structured to allow people time to listen to one another’s thinking. Sometimes the process includes customers; one consulting firm we know started to replace traditional meetings, at which the firm conveyed information to clients, with a workshop format designed to explore questions and develop solutions in collaboration with them. The new format gives both the clients and the consultants a chance to learn from each other.

One of the more thoughtful uses of cross-silo dialogue is the “focused event analysis” (FEA) at Children’s Minnesota. In an FEA people from the health system’s different clinical and operational groups come together after a failure, such as the administration of the wrong medication to a patient. One at a time participants offer their take on what happened; the goal is to carefully document multiple perspectives before trying to identify a cause. Often participants are surprised to learn how people from other groups saw the incident. The assumption underlying the FEA is that most failures have not one root cause but many. Once the folks involved have a multifunctional picture of the contributing factors, they can alter procedures and systems to prevent similar failures.

Hire for curiosity and empathy.

You can boost your company’s capacity to see the world from different perspectives by bringing on board people who relate to and sympathize with the feelings, thoughts, and attitudes of others. Southwest Airlines, which hires fewer than 2% of all applicants,selects people with empathy and enthusiasm for customer service, evaluating them through behavioral interviews (“Tell me about a time when…”) and team interviews in which candidates are observed interacting.

4. Broaden Your Employees’ Vision

You can’t lead at the interfaces if you don’t know where they are. Yet many organizations unwittingly encourage employees to never look beyond their own immediate environment, such as their function or business unit, and as a result miss out on potential insights employees could get if they scanned more-distant networks. Here are some ways that leaders can create opportunities for employees to widen their horizons, both within the company and beyond it:

Bring employees from diverse groups together on initiatives.

As a rule, cross-functional teams give people across silos a chance to identify various kinds of expertise within their organization, map how they’re connected or disconnected, and see how the internal knowledge network can be linked to enable valuable collaboration.

At one global consulting firm, the leader of the digital health-care practice used to have its consultants speak just to clients’ CIOs and CTOs. But she realized that that “unnecessarily limited the practice’s ability to identify opportunities to serve clients beyond IT,” she says. So she began to set up sessions with the entire C-suite at clients and brought in consultants from across all her firm’s health-care practices—including systems redesign, operations excellence, strategy, and financing—to provide a more integrated look at the firm’s health-care innovation expertise.

Those meetings allowed the consultants to discover the connections among the practices in the health-care division, identify the people best positioned to bridge the different practices, and see novel ways to combine the firm’s various kinds of expertise to meet clients’ needs. That helped the consultants spot value-generating opportunities for services at the interfaces between the practices. The new approach was so effective that, in short order, the leader was asked to head up a new practice that served as an interface across all the practices in the IT division so that she could replicate her success in other parts of the firm.

Urge employees to explore distant networks.

Employees also need to be pushed to tap into expertise outside the company and even outside the industry. The domains of human knowledge span science, technology, business, geography, politics, history, the arts, the humanities, and beyond, and any interface between them could hold new business opportunities. Consider the work of the innovation consultancy IDEO. By bringing design techniques from technology, science, and the arts to business, it has been able to create revolutionary products, like the first Apple mouse (which it developed from a Xerox PARC prototype into a commercial offering), and help companies in many industries embrace design thinking as an innovation strategy.

The tricky part is finding the domains most relevant to key business goals. Although many innovations have stemmed from what Abraham Flexner, the founding director of the Institute for Advanced Study, called “the usefulness of useless knowledge,”businesses can ill afford to rely on open-ended exploratory search alone. To avoid this fate, leaders can take one of two approaches:

A top-down approach works when the knowledge domains with high potential for value creation have already been identified. For example, a partner in an accounting firm who sees machine learning as key to the profession’s future might have an interested consultant or analyst in her practice take online courses or attend industry conferences about the technology and ask that person to come back with ideas about its implications. The partner might organize workshops in which the junior employee shares takeaways from the learning experiences and brainstorms, with experienced colleagues, potential applications in the firm.

You can’t lead at the interfaces if you don’t know where they are.

A bottom-up approach is better when leaders have trouble determining which outside domains the organization should connect with—a growing challenge given the speed at which new knowledge is being created. Increasingly, leaders must rely on employees to identify and forge connections with far-flung domains. One approach is to crowdsource ideas for promising interfaces—for example, by inviting employees to propose conferences in other industries they’d like to attend, courses on new skill sets they’d like to take, or domain experts they’d like to bring in for workshops. It’s also critical to give employees the time and resources to scan external domains and build connections to them.

Breaking Down Silos

In today’s economy everyone knows that finding new ways to combine an organization’s diverse knowledge is a winning strategy for creating lasting value. But it doesn’t happen unless employees have the opportunities and tools to work together productively across silos. To unleash the potential of horizontal collaboration, leaders must equip people to learn and to relate to one another across cultural and logistical divides. The four practices we’ve just described can help.

Not only is each one useful on its own in tackling the distinct challenges of interface work, but together these practices are mutually enhancing: Engaging in one promotes competency in another. Deploying cultural brokers who build connections across groups gets people to ask questions and learn what employees in other groups are thinking. When people start asking better questions, they’re immediately better positioned to understand others’ perspectives and challenges. Seeing things from someone else’s perspective—walking in his or her moccasins—in turn makes it easier to detect more pockets of knowledge. And network scanning illuminates interfaces where cultural brokers might be able to help groups collaborate effectively.

Over time these practices—none of which require advanced degrees or deep technical smarts—dissolve the barriers that make boundary-crossing work so difficult. When leaders create conditions that encourage and support these practices, collaboration across the interface will ultimately become second nature.

A version of this article appeared in the May–June 2019 issue (pp.130–139) of Harvard Business Review.

  • Amy C. Edmondson is the Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management at Harvard Business School. Her latest book is Right Kind of Wrong: The Science of Failing Well (Atria Books, forthcoming in September 2023).
  • Sujin Jang is an assistant professor of organisational behaviour at INSEAD. Her research focuses on global teams and the challenges of working across cultures.
  • Tiziana Casciaro is a professor of organizational behavior and HR management and holds the Marcel Desautels Chair in Integrative Thinking at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management. She is the co-author of Power, for All: How It Really Works and Why It’s Everyone’s Business (Simon & Schuster, 2021).

Article link: https://hbr.org/2019/05/cross-silo-leadership?utm_medium=social&utm

Cross-Silo Leadership – HBR

Posted by timmreardon on 08/08/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.
  • Amy C. Edmondson,
  • Sujin Jang,
  • Tiziana Casciaro

From the Magazine (May–June 2019)

Summary

Today the most promising innovation and business opportunities require collaboration among functions, offices, and organizations. To realize them, companies must break down silos and get people working together across boundaries. But that’s a challenge for many leaders. Employees naturally default to focusing on vertical relationships, and formal restructuring is costly, confusing, and slow. What, then, is the solution? Engaging in four activities that promote horizontal teamwork: (1) developing cultural brokers, or employees who excel at connecting across divides; (2) encouraging people to ask questions in an open-ended, unbiased way that genuinely explores others’ thinking; (3) getting people to actively take other points of view; and (4) broadening employees’ vision to include more-distant networks.

By supporting these activities, leaders can help employees connect with new pools of expertise and learn from and relate to people who think very differently from them. And when that happens, interface collaboration will become second nature.

Though most executives recognize the importance of breaking down silos to help people collaborate across boundaries, they struggle to make it happen. That’s understandable: It is devilishly difficult. Think about your own relationships at work—the people you report to and those who report to you, for starters. Now consider the people in other functions, units, or geographies whose work touches yours in some way. Which relationships get prioritized in your day-to-day job?

We’ve posed that question to managers, engineers, salespeople, and consultants in companies around the world. The response we get is almost always the same: vertical relationships.

But when we ask, “Which relationships are most important for creating value for customers?” the answers flip. Today the vast majority of innovation and business-development opportunities lie in the interfaces between functions, offices, or organizations. In short, the integrated solutions that most customers want—but companies wrestle with developing—require horizontal collaboration.

The value of horizontal teamwork is widely recognized. Employees who can reach outside their silos to find colleagues with complementary expertise learn more, sell more, and gain skillsfaster. Harvard’s Heidi Gardner has found that firms with more cross-boundary collaboration achieve greater customer loyalty and higher margins. As innovation hinges more and more on interdisciplinary cooperation, digitalization transforms business at a breakneck pace, and globalization increasingly requires people to work across national borders, the demand for executives who can lead projects at interfaces keeps rising.

Our research and consulting work with hundreds of executives and managers in dozens of organizations confirms both the need for and the challenge of horizontal collaboration. “There’s no doubt. We should focus on big projects that call for integration across practices,” a partner in a global accounting firm told us. “That’s where our greatest distinctive value is developed. But most of us confine ourselves to the smaller projects that we can handle within our practice areas. It’s frustrating.” A senior partner in a leading consulting firm put it slightly differently: “You know you should swim farther to catch a bigger fish, but it is a lot easier to swim in your own pond and catch a bunch of small fish.”

One way to break down silos is to redesign the formal organizational structure. But that approach has limits: It’s costly, confusing, and slow. Worse, every new structure solves some problems but creates others. That’s why we’ve focused on identifying activities that facilitate boundary crossing. We’ve found that people can be trained to see and connect with pools of expertise throughout their organizations and to work better with colleagues who think very differently from them. The core challenges of operating effectively at interfaces are simple: learningabout people on the other side and relating to them. But simple does not mean easy; human beings have always struggled to understand and relate to those who are different.

Leaders need to help people develop the capacity to overcome these challenges on both individual and organizational levels. That means providing training in and support for four practices that enable effective interface work.

1. Develop and Deploy Cultural Brokers

Fortunately, in most companies there are people who already excel at interface collaboration. They usually have experiences and relationships that span multiple sectors, functions, or domains and informally serve as links between them. We call these people cultural brokers. In studies involving more than 2,000 global teams, one of us—Sujin—found that diverse teams containing a cultural broker significantly outperformed diverse teams without one. (See “The Most Creative Teams Have a Specific Type of Cultural Diversity,”HBR.org, July 24, 2018.) Companies should identify these individuals and help them increase their impact.

Cultural brokers promote cross-boundary work in one of two ways: by acting as a bridge or as an adhesive.

A bridge offers himself as a go-between, allowing people in different functions or geographies to collaborate with minimal disruption to their day-to-day routine. Bridges are most effective when they have considerable knowledge of both sides and can figure out what each one needs. This is why the champagne and spirits distributor Moët Hennessy España hired two enologists, or wine experts, to help coordinate the work of its marketing and sales groups, which had a history of miscommunication and conflict. The enologists could relate to both groups equally: They could speak to marketers about the emotional content (the ephemeral “bouquet”) of brands, while also providing pragmatic salespeople with details on the distinctive features of products they needed to win over retailers. Understanding both worlds, the enologists were able to communicate the rationale for each group’s modus operandi to the other, allowing marketing and sales to work more synergistically even without directly interacting. This kind of cultural brokerage is efficient because it lets disparate parties work around differences without investing in learning the other side’s perspective or changing how they work. It’s especially valuable for one-off collaborations or when the company is under intense time pressure to deliver results.

Employees who can reach outside their silos learn more and sell more.

Adhesives, in contrast, bring people together and help build mutual understanding and lasting relationships. Take one manager we spoke with at National Instruments, a global producer of automated test equipment. He frequently connects colleagues from different regions and functions. “I think of it as building up the relationships between them,” he told us. “If a colleague needs to work with someone in another office or function, I would tell them, ‘OK, here’s the person to call.’ Then I’d take the time to sit down and say, ‘Well, let me tell you a little bit about how these guys work.’” Adhesives facilitate collaboration by vouching for people and helping them decipher one another’s language. Unlike bridges, adhesives develop others’ capacity to work across a boundary in the future without their assistance.

Company leaders can build both bridging and adhesive capabilities in their organizations by hiring people with multifunctional or multicultural backgrounds who have the strong interpersonal skills needed to build rapport with multiple parties. Because it takes resilience to work with people across cultural divides, firms should also look for a growth mindset—the desire to learn and to take on challenges and “stretch” opportunities.

In addition, leaders can develop more brokers by giving people at all levels the chance to move into roles that expose them to multiple parts of the company. This, by the way, is good training for general managers and is what many rotational leadership-development programs aim to accomplish. Claudine Wolfe, the head of talent and development at the global insurer Chubb, maintains that the company’s capacity to serve customers around the world rests on giving top performers opportunities to work in different geographies and cultivate an international mindset. “We give people their critical development experiences steeped in the job, in the region,” she says. “They get coaching in the cultural norms and the language, but then they live it and internalize it. They go to the local bodega, take notice of the products on the shelves, have conversations with the merchant, and learn what it really means to live in that environment.”

Matrix organizational structures, in which people report to two (or more) groups, can also help develop cultural brokers. Despite their inherent challenges (they can be infuriatingly hard to navigate without strong leadership and accountability), matrices get people used to operating at interfaces.

We’re not saying that everyone in your organization needs to be a full-fledged cultural broker. But consciously expanding the ranks of brokers and deploying them to grease the wheels of collaboration can go a long way.

2. Encourage People to Ask the Right Questions

It’s nearly impossible to work across boundaries without asking a lot of questions. Inquiry is critical because what we see and take for granted on one side of an interface is not the same as what people experience on the other side.

Indeed, a study of more than 1,000 middle managers at a large bank that Tiziana conducted with Bill McEvily and Evelyn Zhang of the University of Toronto and Francesca Gino of Harvard Business School highlights the value of inquisitiveness in boundary-crossing work. It showed that managers with high levels of curiosity were more likely to build networks that spanned disconnected parts of the company.

But all of us are vulnerable to forgetting the crucial practice of asking questions as we move up the ladder. High-achieving people in particular frequently fail to wonder what others are seeing. Worse, when we do recognize that we don’t know something, we may avoid asking a question out of (misguided) fear that it will make us look incompetent or weak. “Not asking questions is a big mistake many professionals make,” Norma Kraay, the managing partner of talent for Deloitte Canada, told us. “Expert advisers want to offer a solution. That’s what they’re trained to do.”

Leaders can encourage inquiry in two important ways—and in the process help create an organization where it’s psychologically safe to ask questions.

Be a role model.

When leaders show interest in what others are seeing and thinking by asking questions, it has a stunning effect: It prompts people in their organizations to do the same.

Asking questions also conveys the humility that more and more business leaders and researchers are pointing to as vital to success. According to Laszlo Bock, Google’s former senior vice president of people operations, humble people are better at bringing others together to solve tough problems. In a fast-changing business environment, humility—not to be confused with false modesty—is simply a strength. Its power comes from realism (as in It really is a complex, challenging world out there; if we don’t work together, we don’t stand a chance).

Gino says one way a leader can make employees feel comfortable asking questions is by openly acknowledging when he or she doesn’t know the answer. Another, she says, is by having days in which employees are explicitly encouraged to ask “Why?” “What if…?” and “How might we…?” (See “The Business Case for Curiosity,”HBR, September–October 2018.)

Teach employees the art of inquiry.

Training can help expand the range and frequency of questions employees ask and, according to Hal Gregersen of the MIT Leadership Center, can reinvigorate their sense of curiosity. But some questions are better than others. And if you simply tell people to raise more questions, you might unleash interrogation tactics that inhibit rather than encourage the development of new perspectives. As MIT’s Edgar Schein explains in his book Humble Inquiry,questions are the secret to productive work relationships—but they must be driven by genuine interest in understanding another’s view.

How to Ask Good Questions

COMMON PITFALLSEFFECTIVE INQUIRY

Start with yes-or-no questions.Start with open-ended questions that minimize preconceptions. (“How are things going on your end?” “What does your group see as the key opportunity in this space?”)Continue asking overly general questions (“What’s on your mind?”) that may invite long off-point responses.As collaborations develop, ask questions that focus on specific issues but allow people plenty of room to elaborate. (“What do you know about x?” “Can you explain how that works?”)Assume that you’ve grasped what speakers intended.Check your understanding by summarizing what you’re hearing and asking explicitly for corrections or missing elements. (“Does that sound right—am I missing anything?” “Can you help me fill in the gaps?”)Assume the collaboration process will take care of itself.Periodically take time to inquire into others’ experiences of the process or relationship. (“How do you think the project is going?” “What could we do to work together more effectively?”)

It’s also important to learn how to request information in the least biased way possible. This means asking open-ended questions that minimize preconceptions, rather than yes-or-no questions. For instance, “What do you see as the key opportunity in this space?” will generate a richer dialogue than “Do you think this is the right opportunity to pursue?”

As collaborations move forward, it’s helpful for team leaders or project managers to raise queries that encourage others to dive more deeply into specific issues and express related ideas or experiences. “What do you know about x?” and “Can you explain how that works?” are two examples. These questions are focused but neither limit responses nor invite long discourses that stray too far from the issue at hand.

How you process the answers also matters. It’s natural, as conversations unfold, to assume you understand what’s being said. But what people hear is biased by their expertise and experiences. So it’s important to train people to check whether they’re truly getting their colleagues’ meaning, by using language like “This is what I’m hearing—did I miss anything?” or “Can you help me fill in the gaps?” or “I think what you said means the project is on track. Is that correct?”

Finally, periodic temperature taking is needed to examine the collaborative process itself. The only way to find out how others are experiencing a project or relationship is by asking questions such as “How do you think the project is going?” and “What could we do to work together more effectively?”

3. Get People to See the World Through Others’ Eyes

Leaders shouldn’t just encourage employees to be curious about different groups and ask questions about their thinking and practices; they should also urge their people to actively consider others’ points of view. People from different organizational groups don’t see things the same way. Studies (including research on barriers to successful product innovation that the management professor Deborah Dougherty conducted at Wharton) consistently reveal that this leads to misunderstandings in interface work. It’s vital, therefore, to help people learn how to take the perspectives of others. One of us, Amy, has done research showing that ambitious cross-industry innovation projects succeed when diverse participants discover how to do this. New Songdo, a project to build a city from scratch in South Korea that launched a decade ago, provides an instructive example. Early in the effort, project leaders brought together architects, engineers, planners, and environmental experts and helped them integrate their expertise in a carefully crafted learning process designed to break down barriers between disciplines. Today, in striking contrast to other “smart” city projects, New Songdo is 50% complete and has 30,000 residents, 33,000 jobs, and emissions that are 70% lower than those of other developments its size.

In a study of jazz bands and Broadway productions, Brian Uzzi of Northwestern University foundthat leaders of successful teams had an unusual ability to assume other people’s viewpoints. These leaders could speak the multiple “languages” of their teammates. Other research has shown that when members of a diverse team proactively take the perspectives of others, it enhances the positive effect of information sharing and increases the team’s creativity.

Creating a culture that fosters this kind of behavior is a senior leadership responsibility. Psychological research suggests that while most people are capableof taking others’ perspectives, they are rarely motivated to do so. Leaders can provide some motivation by emphasizing to their teams how much the integration of diverse expertise enhances new value creation. But a couple of other tactics will help:

Organize cross-silo dialogues.

Instead of holding one-way information sessions, leaders should set up cross-silo discussions that help employees see the world through the eyes of customers or colleagues in other parts of the company. The goal is to get everyone to share knowledge and work on synthesizing that diverse input into new solutions. This happens best in face-to-face meetings that are carefully structured to allow people time to listen to one another’s thinking. Sometimes the process includes customers; one consulting firm we know started to replace traditional meetings, at which the firm conveyed information to clients, with a workshop format designed to explore questions and develop solutions in collaboration with them. The new format gives both the clients and the consultants a chance to learn from each other.

One of the more thoughtful uses of cross-silo dialogue is the “focused event analysis” (FEA) at Children’s Minnesota. In an FEA people from the health system’s different clinical and operational groups come together after a failure, such as the administration of the wrong medication to a patient. One at a time participants offer their take on what happened; the goal is to carefully document multiple perspectives before trying to identify a cause. Often participants are surprised to learn how people from other groups saw the incident. The assumption underlying the FEA is that most failures have not one root cause but many. Once the folks involved have a multifunctional picture of the contributing factors, they can alter procedures and systems to prevent similar failures.

Hire for curiosity and empathy.

You can boost your company’s capacity to see the world from different perspectives by bringing on board people who relate to and sympathize with the feelings, thoughts, and attitudes of others. Southwest Airlines, which hires fewer than 2% of all applicants,selects people with empathy and enthusiasm for customer service, evaluating them through behavioral interviews (“Tell me about a time when…”) and team interviews in which candidates are observed interacting.

4. Broaden Your Employees’ Vision

You can’t lead at the interfaces if you don’t know where they are. Yet many organizations unwittingly encourage employees to never look beyond their own immediate environment, such as their function or business unit, and as a result miss out on potential insights employees could get if they scanned more-distant networks. Here are some ways that leaders can create opportunities for employees to widen their horizons, both within the company and beyond it:

Bring employees from diverse groups together on initiatives.

As a rule, cross-functional teams give people across silos a chance to identify various kinds of expertise within their organization, map how they’re connected or disconnected, and see how the internal knowledge network can be linked to enable valuable collaboration.

At one global consulting firm, the leader of the digital health-care practice used to have its consultants speak just to clients’ CIOs and CTOs. But she realized that that “unnecessarily limited the practice’s ability to identify opportunities to serve clients beyond IT,” she says. So she began to set up sessions with the entire C-suite at clients and brought in consultants from across all her firm’s health-care practices—including systems redesign, operations excellence, strategy, and financing—to provide a more integrated look at the firm’s health-care innovation expertise.

Those meetings allowed the consultants to discover the connections among the practices in the health-care division, identify the people best positioned to bridge the different practices, and see novel ways to combine the firm’s various kinds of expertise to meet clients’ needs. That helped the consultants spot value-generating opportunities for services at the interfaces between the practices. The new approach was so effective that, in short order, the leader was asked to head up a new practice that served as an interface across all the practices in the IT division so that she could replicate her success in other parts of the firm.

Urge employees to explore distant networks.

Employees also need to be pushed to tap into expertise outside the company and even outside the industry. The domains of human knowledge span science, technology, business, geography, politics, history, the arts, the humanities, and beyond, and any interface between them could hold new business opportunities. Consider the work of the innovation consultancy IDEO. By bringing design techniques from technology, science, and the arts to business, it has been able to create revolutionary products, like the first Apple mouse (which it developed from a Xerox PARC prototype into a commercial offering), and help companies in many industries embrace design thinking as an innovation strategy.

The tricky part is finding the domains most relevant to key business goals. Although many innovations have stemmed from what Abraham Flexner, the founding director of the Institute for Advanced Study, called “the usefulness of useless knowledge,”businesses can ill afford to rely on open-ended exploratory search alone. To avoid this fate, leaders can take one of two approaches:

A top-down approach works when the knowledge domains with high potential for value creation have already been identified. For example, a partner in an accounting firm who sees machine learning as key to the profession’s future might have an interested consultant or analyst in her practice take online courses or attend industry conferences about the technology and ask that person to come back with ideas about its implications. The partner might organize workshops in which the junior employee shares takeaways from the learning experiences and brainstorms, with experienced colleagues, potential applications in the firm.

You can’t lead at the interfaces if you don’t know where they are.

A bottom-up approach is better when leaders have trouble determining which outside domains the organization should connect with—a growing challenge given the speed at which new knowledge is being created. Increasingly, leaders must rely on employees to identify and forge connections with far-flung domains. One approach is to crowdsource ideas for promising interfaces—for example, by inviting employees to propose conferences in other industries they’d like to attend, courses on new skill sets they’d like to take, or domain experts they’d like to bring in for workshops. It’s also critical to give employees the time and resources to scan external domains and build connections to them.

Breaking Down Silos

In today’s economy everyone knows that finding new ways to combine an organization’s diverse knowledge is a winning strategy for creating lasting value. But it doesn’t happen unless employees have the opportunities and tools to work together productively across silos. To unleash the potential of horizontal collaboration, leaders must equip people to learn and to relate to one another across cultural and logistical divides. The four practices we’ve just described can help.

Not only is each one useful on its own in tackling the distinct challenges of interface work, but together these practices are mutually enhancing: Engaging in one promotes competency in another. Deploying cultural brokers who build connections across groups gets people to ask questions and learn what employees in other groups are thinking. When people start asking better questions, they’re immediately better positioned to understand others’ perspectives and challenges. Seeing things from someone else’s perspective—walking in his or her moccasins—in turn makes it easier to detect more pockets of knowledge. And network scanning illuminates interfaces where cultural brokers might be able to help groups collaborate effectively.

Over time these practices—none of which require advanced degrees or deep technical smarts—dissolve the barriers that make boundary-crossing work so difficult. When leaders create conditions that encourage and support these practices, collaboration across the interface will ultimately become second nature.

A version of this article appeared in the May–June 2019 issue (pp.130–139) of Harvard Business Review.

  • Amy C. Edmondson is the Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management at Harvard Business School. Her latest book is Right Kind of Wrong: The Science of Failing Well (Atria Books, forthcoming in September 2023).
  • Sujin Jang is an assistant professor of organisational behaviour at INSEAD. Her research focuses on global teams and the challenges of working across cultures.
  • Tiziana Casciaro is a professor of organizational behavior and HR management and holds the Marcel Desautels Chair in Integrative Thinking at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management. She is the co-author of Power, for All: How It Really Works and Why It’s Everyone’s Business (Simon & Schuster, 2021).

Article link: https://hbr.org/2019/05/cross-silo-leadership?utm_medium=social&utm

DISA takes over premier cyber defense tool from NSA

Posted by timmreardon on 08/07/2023
Posted in: Uncategorized.

By Kashia Simmons / Office of Strategic Communication and Public Affairs

Defense Information Systems Agency and National Security Agency officials met in Annapolis Junction, Maryland, July 20, to celebrate the final transition of a critical boundary defense tool for the United States Department of Defense.

SHARKSEER officially transitioned from NSA on June 30, marking the beginning of a new era in cybersecurity for the DOD Information Network, as DISA assumes responsibility for the program’s operations and management.

“DODIN is a no-fail mission, so many are dependent on this success,” said Catherine Aucella, NSA executive director. “Thank you to DISA for taking this mission and keeping it going.”

SHARKSEER is a system of commercial, government and open-source systems that actively detects, alerts and blocks malicious, suspected or anomalous network traffic through automated and analyst-driven blocking mechanisms. The program was developed and engineered by the NSA in 2015 and was developed as an adaptive platform, capable of quickly integrating new technologies wherever SHARKSEER systems are deployed.

DISA has been an active partner in SHARKSEER since the beginning and was designated as the transition organization for the program in the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act.

“The fact that NSA and DISA were able to work together over the past four years to successfully transition the SHARKSEER program from one agency to another – not a common action or request – with minimal breaks in service is a testament to this relationship,” said James L. Cody, NSA Cross Access Front End Solutions chief.

There have been multiple DISA employees who have supported SHARKSEER over the years to lead up to this day, said Olanrewaju J. Bucknor, DISA SHARKSEER program engineer, who’s worked on the program for three years. Bucknor explained that NSA remains an integral partner in SHARKSEER, providing software and applications within the environment.

“Ensuring the sustainability and functionality of the SHARKSEER DODIN Boundary Cyber Defense systems ensures all DOD mission partners have a dynamic internet facing protective shield from known and emerging adversarial cyber threats,” Cody said.

SHARKSEER complements existing defense-in-depth capabilities of DISA Global’s defensive cyber operations mission by providing an orchestrated, behavioral analytic platform capable of actively blocking suspicious or potentially malicious objects. SHARKSEER also provides unique threat data content to inform other defensive systems for mitigation.

“Geographically deploying the SHARKSEER capability at the 10 DISA-managed internet access points to monitor traffic provides an unprecedented level of visibility to the warfighter supporting the DOD cyber network defense incident response mission,” said Alexis Grayson, DISA SHARKSEER program manager.

DISA will continue to develop and evolve SHARKSEER systems, with plans to add multifactor authentication, transition to a zero-trust model and utilize more cloud-based security solutions to improve scalability, flexibility and centralized management among other capabilities, Grayson said.

Visit DISA.mil for more agency news and updates.

Article link: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/disa-takes-over-premier-cyber-defense

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →
  • Search site

  • Follow healthcarereimagined on WordPress.com
  • Recent Posts

    • By Barring Profits on Basic Coverage, Switzerland Keeps Insurers from Denying Care – Commonwealth Fund 10/19/2026
    • Patients’ Perspectives on AI in Primary Care – Commonwealth Fund 09/11/2026
    • Bitcoin Mining Energy Footprint 08/06/2026
    • Closing the AI Hype Gap 08/05/2026
    • Why Artificial Intelligence is Neither Artificial, Nor Intelligent 07/31/2026
    • Agentic AI, explained 07/05/2026
    • Heeding the pope’s call to ensure AI protects human dignity – MIT Sloan Management 06/01/2026
    • Association between Wealth and Mortality in the United States and Europe – New England Journal of Medicine 05/30/2026
    • U.S. Health Care from a Global Perspective, 2026 – The Commonwealth Fund 05/30/2026
    • Anthropic co-founder Chris Olah’s remarks on Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical “Magnifica humanitas” 05/28/2026
  • Categories

    • Accountable Care Organizations
    • ACOs
    • AHRQ
    • American Board of Internal Medicine
    • Big Data
    • Blue Button
    • Board Certification
    • Cancer Treatment
    • Data Science
    • Digital Services Playbook
    • DoD
    • EHR Interoperability
    • EHR Usability
    • Emergency Medicine
    • FDA
    • FDASIA
    • GAO Reports
    • Genetic Data
    • Genetic Research
    • Genomic Data
    • Global Standards
    • Health Care Costs
    • Health Care Economics
    • Health IT adoption
    • Health Outcomes
    • Healthcare Delivery
    • Healthcare Informatics
    • Healthcare Outcomes
    • Healthcare Security
    • Helathcare Delivery
    • HHS
    • HIPAA
    • ICD-10
    • Innovation
    • Integrated Electronic Health Records
    • IT Acquisition
    • JASONS
    • Lab Report Access
    • Military Health System Reform
    • Mobile Health
    • Mobile Healthcare
    • National Health IT System
    • NSF
    • ONC Reports to Congress
    • Oncology
    • Open Data
    • Patient Centered Medical Home
    • Patient Portals
    • PCMH
    • Precision Medicine
    • Primary Care
    • Public Health
    • Quadruple Aim
    • Quality Measures
    • Rehab Medicine
    • TechFAR Handbook
    • Triple Aim
    • U.S. Air Force Medicine
    • U.S. Army
    • U.S. Army Medicine
    • U.S. Navy Medicine
    • U.S. Surgeon General
    • Uncategorized
    • Value-based Care
    • Veterans Affairs
    • Warrior Transistion Units
    • XPRIZE
  • Archives

    • October 2026 (1)
    • September 2026 (1)
    • August 2026 (2)
    • July 2026 (2)
    • June 2026 (1)
    • May 2026 (12)
    • April 2026 (4)
    • March 2026 (9)
    • February 2026 (6)
    • January 2026 (8)
    • December 2025 (11)
    • November 2025 (9)
    • October 2025 (10)
    • September 2025 (4)
    • August 2025 (7)
    • July 2025 (2)
    • June 2025 (9)
    • May 2025 (4)
    • April 2025 (11)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • February 2025 (10)
    • January 2025 (12)
    • December 2024 (12)
    • November 2024 (7)
    • October 2024 (5)
    • September 2024 (9)
    • August 2024 (10)
    • July 2024 (13)
    • June 2024 (18)
    • May 2024 (10)
    • April 2024 (19)
    • March 2024 (35)
    • February 2024 (23)
    • January 2024 (16)
    • December 2023 (22)
    • November 2023 (38)
    • October 2023 (24)
    • September 2023 (24)
    • August 2023 (34)
    • July 2023 (33)
    • June 2023 (30)
    • May 2023 (35)
    • April 2023 (30)
    • March 2023 (30)
    • February 2023 (15)
    • January 2023 (17)
    • December 2022 (10)
    • November 2022 (7)
    • October 2022 (22)
    • September 2022 (16)
    • August 2022 (33)
    • July 2022 (28)
    • June 2022 (42)
    • May 2022 (53)
    • April 2022 (35)
    • March 2022 (37)
    • February 2022 (21)
    • January 2022 (28)
    • December 2021 (23)
    • November 2021 (12)
    • October 2021 (10)
    • September 2021 (4)
    • August 2021 (4)
    • July 2021 (4)
    • May 2021 (3)
    • April 2021 (1)
    • March 2021 (2)
    • February 2021 (1)
    • January 2021 (4)
    • December 2020 (7)
    • November 2020 (2)
    • October 2020 (4)
    • September 2020 (7)
    • August 2020 (11)
    • July 2020 (3)
    • June 2020 (5)
    • April 2020 (3)
    • March 2020 (1)
    • February 2020 (1)
    • January 2020 (2)
    • December 2019 (2)
    • November 2019 (1)
    • September 2019 (4)
    • August 2019 (3)
    • July 2019 (5)
    • June 2019 (10)
    • May 2019 (8)
    • April 2019 (6)
    • March 2019 (7)
    • February 2019 (17)
    • January 2019 (14)
    • December 2018 (10)
    • November 2018 (20)
    • October 2018 (14)
    • September 2018 (27)
    • August 2018 (19)
    • July 2018 (16)
    • June 2018 (18)
    • May 2018 (28)
    • April 2018 (3)
    • March 2018 (11)
    • February 2018 (5)
    • January 2018 (10)
    • December 2017 (20)
    • November 2017 (30)
    • October 2017 (33)
    • September 2017 (11)
    • August 2017 (13)
    • July 2017 (9)
    • June 2017 (8)
    • May 2017 (9)
    • April 2017 (4)
    • March 2017 (12)
    • December 2016 (3)
    • September 2016 (4)
    • August 2016 (1)
    • July 2016 (7)
    • June 2016 (7)
    • April 2016 (4)
    • March 2016 (7)
    • February 2016 (1)
    • January 2016 (3)
    • November 2015 (3)
    • October 2015 (2)
    • September 2015 (9)
    • August 2015 (6)
    • June 2015 (5)
    • May 2015 (6)
    • April 2015 (3)
    • March 2015 (16)
    • February 2015 (10)
    • January 2015 (16)
    • December 2014 (9)
    • November 2014 (7)
    • October 2014 (21)
    • September 2014 (8)
    • August 2014 (9)
    • July 2014 (7)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (8)
    • April 2014 (19)
    • March 2014 (8)
    • February 2014 (9)
    • January 2014 (31)
    • December 2013 (23)
    • November 2013 (48)
    • October 2013 (25)
  • Tags

    Business Defense Department Department of Veterans Affairs EHealth EHR Electronic health record Food and Drug Administration Health Health informatics Health Information Exchange Health information technology Health system HIE Hospital IBM Mayo Clinic Medicare Medicine Military Health System Patient Patient portal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act United States United States Department of Defense United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Upcoming Events

Blog at WordPress.com.
healthcarereimagined
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    healthcarereimagined
    Join 149 other subscribers

    Have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.

  • healthcarereimagined
    View site in Reader
    Manage subscriptionsSign upLog in
    Report this content
    Collapse this bar
Loading Comments...