healthcarereimagined

Envisioning healthcare for the 21st century

  • About
  • Economics

ONC delays launch of Blue Button Connector until late February – mobihealth

Posted by timmreardon on 01/21/2014
Posted in: Blue Button, Healthcare Delivery, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Mobile Healthcare, Open Data. Leave a comment

Blue Button Connector

Article link:

The US Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT is slowing its rollout launch of a website meant to encourage patients to take a more active role in their own care.

ONC will wait until verifying that all the data on Blue Button Connector, a planned hub for consumers to find sources of health data to download as well as Blue Button Plustechnology to facilitate it, is accurate, according to Lygeia Ricciardi, director of ONC’s Office of Consumer eHealth. “I want people on this site,” and she wants the information to be trusted, Ricciardi told MobiHealthNews after speaking at the Digital Health Summit at International CES in Las Vegas last week.

Ricciardi had said in September that ONC was targeting mid-January for launching the Blue Button Connector. As of Monday, ONC’s Blue Button site said the connector was “coming soon.” Expect a beta version to go live in time for the Health Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) conference in late February, Ricciardi said.

The federal agency also is holding off on releasing a series of public-service announcements until there is enough heft behind the Blue Button name to make it worthwhile for people to visit the Connector site. “It’s really a symbol and a brand that can enhance your brand,” Ricciardi said during a short presentation aimed at getting healthcare organizations and technology vendors interested in the concept. She said she would like to see Blue Button take on the kind of cachet as the EnergyStar, USDA Organic or, in the private sector, Intel Inside logos.

At least three other factors are behind the delay. Though Blue Button Connector will not have a new URL, the White House has imposed a moratorium on new federal websites until the Obama administration gets healthcare.gov working properly and, according to Ricciardi, is trying to review and streamline the stable of .gov URLs.

The Dec. 31 departure of Leon Rodriguez as director of the HHS Office for Civil Rights to take over as head of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services may also be behind the delay. OCR, which is in charge of enforcing HIPAA privacy and security regulations, has been trying to spread the word about patients having the right to access their own health data.

Plus, the announcement four months ago came just two weeks before the federal government shut down, leaving Ricciardi and most of her ONC colleagues locked out of their workplace for the first half of October.

At CES, Ricciardi promised an announcement in the near future that more than one major retail pharmacy chain would make data available to customers via Blue Button. Ricciardi also said that pharmaceutical manufacturers Pfizer, Novartis and Eli Lilly & Co. have asked ONC to help them provide Blue Button access to patients enrolled in clinical trials.

To date, Ricciardi added, 17 publicly available apps now use structured Blue Button Plus data. “We ultimately want people to be using structured data,” she said. In September, another ONC official said to expect at least a dozen apps on Blue Button Connector when the site goes live.

Several app vendors, including ONC award winner Humetrix and longstanding healthcare mobile app developer Epocrates, echoed Ricciardi’s sentiments about Blue Button Plus in their own presentations at the Digital Health Summit.

“Blue Button is to health data what DOS is to PCs,” said Abbe Don, VP for user experience at Epocrates, a San Mateo, Calif.-based subsidiary of EHR service provider athenahealth. The major difference, according to Don, is that Blue Button is in the public domain and open-source, having been created at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

Don also demonstrated how standard, unstructured Blue Button data does look like a DOS display, in that is plain text. Blue Button Plus adds a graphical user interface and other formatting to make data more relevant, she said.

“You need clinical relevance and great design and a great [user] experience,” Don said.

NDAA 2014 SEC 713. ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF DoD and VETERANS AFFAIRS

Posted by timmreardon on 01/18/2014
Posted in: DoD, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Security, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Patient Centered Medical Home, PCMH, Quality Measures, U.S. Army, U.S. Navy Medicine, Veterans Affairs, Warrior Transistion Units. Leave a comment

Link to Full Text: NDAA 2014 – Section 713

NDAA 2014 Sec 713. ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF DoD and Veterans Affairs

Quit Wasting Money on e-Health Records, Congress Tells Defense and VA – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 01/18/2014
Posted in: DoD, Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Security, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Patient Centered Medical Home, PCMH, Veterans Affairs. Leave a comment

nextgov-medium 5

Article link: http://www.nextgov.com/defense/2014/01/quit-wasting-money-e-health-records-congress-tells-defense-and-va/76943/

Worried that the Defense and Veterans Affairs departments might continue to spend years and billions of dollars in a “futile exercise” to develop their own electronic health record systems “and lose sight of the end-goal of an interoperable record,” lawmakers included funding restrictions in the 2014 Omnibus Appropriations Act the House passed Wednesday.

Both the House VA and Defense appropriations committees have defined the goal –interoperability — as the ability to exchange computable information electronically between the departments based on common data standards. Similar language is included in the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act signed by President Obama late last month. The omnibus spending bill eliminated language in an earlier version of the 2014 VA appropriations bill that called for development of a single record to serve both departments.

The two departments abandoned efforts to develop a single EHR in February 2013 when the estimated costs of a system reached $28 billion, four years after President Obama called for development of a joint record in April 2009.

“The committees want to be very clear with both departments: An interoperable record between the two departments is the chief end goal for Congress,” said the VA section of the omnibus bill the House approved Wednesday.

“The evolution and/or procurement of new health record systems is an important project for the departments to undertake, but it will end up being a futile exercise if the result is not the development of systems that will be interoperable, defined as the ability to exchange computable information electronically,” the section said. “There is rising concern the departments will spend years and billions of dollars on their own electronic health record systems and lose sight of the end-goal of an interoperable record.”

The VA section of the omnibus bill transfers $251.9 million that VA originally requested for the integrated EHR to support development of an upgraded version of its Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture, dubbed VistA Evolution. It provides $32.9 million for the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record, which includes benefits information.

The language precludes VA from spending more than 25 percent of the VistA Evolution budget until the department describes to Congress how it will adhere to data standards defined by the Interagency Program Office, or IPO, which  was originally set up to develop the integrated EHR. The lawmakers also want updates on “how testing will be conducted in order to ensure interoperabity between current and future DoD and VA systems.”

The Defense Appropriations Committee said the IPO — whose director, Barclay Butler, departed last September with little public notice — now has the responsibility to establish and approve the clinical and technical data standards that “will insure seamless integration of health data between the two departments and private health care providers.”

Last May, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel backed development of a new Defense EHR based on commercial software. In September, the Pentagon established the Defense Healthcare Management Systems Modernization, or DHMSM, office to manage development of the new EHR.

DHMSM plans to kick off a procurement for the new Defense EHR in March. The Defense section of the omnibus bill allows DHMSM to spend only 25 percent of its budget until it provides Congress with a budget for the full cost of the new EHR. The omnibus bill does not break out the DHSM EHR budget, but chopped the overall procurement budget for the Defense Health Agency by $204.2 million for the integrated EHR it now considers as “excess.”

The Defense Appropriations Committee echoed the VA Committee, saying it is “imperative” that the Pentagon “does not lose sight of the ultimate goal of interoperability” with the VA EHR.

Get the Nextgov iPhone app to keep up with government technology news.

(Image via mayamaya/Shutterstock.com)

Gates Tells Jon Stewart He ‘Failed’ on Joint Health Record – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 01/18/2014
Posted in: Uncategorized. Leave a comment

Article link: http://www.nextgov.com/defense/whats-brewin/2014/01/gates-tells-jon-stewart-he-failed-joint-health-record/77060/?oref=nextgov_today_nl

Video link; http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-january-15-2014/exclusive—robert-gates-extended-interview-pt–3

Robert Gates failed to overcome the turf wars have prevented development of an integrated electronic health record to serve both the Defense and Veterans Affairs departments, the former Defense secretary told comedian Jon Stewart.

Gates said he and VA Secretary Eric Shinseki agreed on the need for a joint record, but faced bureaucratic pushback. “At the end of the day, Shinseki and I simply could not get the technical people to abandon their turf consciousness and their insistence on owning their own system and not combining the two,” he said Wednesday on the Daily Show.

Gates told Stewart he wanted to outsource development of the joint health record to the private sector because “when the government tries to build something really big and really complicated, especially in the technical world, it almost always fails.”

The Pentagon now plans to have its next generation health record developed by contractors while VA plans to upgrade its Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology (VistA) health record.

Gates also blasted what he called the “artificially precise” nature of the disability evaluation system which begins payments at 30 percent disability – instead of 28 percent or 32 percent. The system, Gates said, needs to err on the side of the soldier.

 

CIOs gauge decade of health IT headway – Healthcare IT News

Posted by timmreardon on 01/17/2014
Posted in: Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Security, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Mobile Healthcare, Open Data, Patient Centered Medical Home, PCMH, Quality Measures. Leave a comment
CIOs gauge decade of health IT headway
“The journey, and work, is far from over,” said Paul Tang, MD. “But with the progress the country has achieved, the train is well out of the station, and we are well on our way towards a more adaptable and rational health system.”

Strides have been made on digital front, yet big problems remain to be solved

January 17, 2014

Article link: http://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/cios-gauge-decade-health-it-headway?single-page=true

The healthcare IT industry just marked  the 10-year anniversary of then President George W. Bush’s call to action – in his 2004 State of the Union address – to finally transform a paper-mired healthcare system into a digital-age industry that operates more like other sectors of the economy.

As we look back on 10 years, we spoke to some leaders on the frontline of health information technology, asking them to take measure of how far the industry has moved towards a truly high-tech, data-driven system of care.

Bill Spooner, Sharp Healthcare

Bill Spooner, vice president and chief information officer of Sharp Healthcare in San Diego has had an epiphany or two on his way to digital transformation. There was a time, for instance, when he advocated for best-of-breed systems. But he changed his tune when he realized there were too many interoperability headaches.

In an interview with Healthcare IT News in early 2010, Spooner addressed the issue of best-of breed technology versus enterprise systems.

He was proud, he said, of his and his colleagues’ willingness to make a change when it became clear they needed to go in a different direction on their core hospital systems, or EMR, back in 2006.

Bill Spooner“We were willing to recognize that the strategy we were taking in terms of our best-of-breed group of products just wasn’t going to bring us the value that we really needed to achieve,” Spooner said in the interview. “We began to pull out a half a dozen best-of-breed products in exchange for the integrated group of products that we are now implementing from Cerner.”

Spooner may have been early to change his tack, but today he is far from alone, with many medium and large health systems rolling out Epic or Cerner EHRs. Even pioneers in health IT are replacing their homegrown systems with commercial systems, usually with either Epic or Cerner, the two most selected enterprise EHR companies in the market today.

Partners HealthCare in Boston is in the midst of an Epic system rollout. Intermountain Healthcare in Salt Lake City recently announced a partnership with Cerner.

“We have very set ideas on how we think these systems should work, and we feel very passionately about it,” said Intermountain CIO Marc Probst, in a video announcement last September. “Intermountain is committed to being innovative in the area of information systems.”

Intermountain is recognized as one of the pioneers of innovation, having built its own systems from the get go to advance its data-driven approach to healthcare, which continues today.

Cerner’s open architecture technology was critical to Intermountain’s decision to partner with the EHR vendor, Probst said. Among other advantages, the open architecture will allow for the addition of the new Intermountain content. Cerner’s focus on population health was another attraction.

“We share a common vision to improve care for populations of people,” said Brent James, MD, chief quality officer at Intermountain.

“This partnership will accelerate our efforts to provide core functionality to our caregivers as we create new innovations to transform healthcare,” he added, in a video announcing the launch. “By integrating the Cerner system with our electronic data warehouse, we will continue to drive improvements in healthcare quality.”

At Partners HealthCare, Scott MacLean, deputy CIO and director of IS Operations, said: “We realized that much of the functionality we developed is available commercially, so we’re adopting a vendor platform and will focus our innovation on genomics and other research discoveries we want to bring to the bedside and clinics.”

Sharp Healthcare’s Spooner said that today the health network has very little paper comprising the patient record. Physicians enter orders virtually, and they document online.

“The data has become actionable for care improvement,” he said.

In the not so distant past, physicians at Sharp Healthcare were not convinced the EMR was essential to the quality patient care, Spooner said. “Today they see it as indispensable to care. My challenge is to regularly bring added or improved EMR functionality, and to ensure constant availability – no scheduled or unscheduled downtime.”

Paul Tang, MD, Palo Alto Medical Foundation

As vice president and chief innovation and technology officer at the Palo Alto Medical Foundation, as well as a top federal policy adviser, Paul Tang, MD, brings a unique perspective, as does Probst who, like Tang, serves as CIO at Intermountain and also sits on the federal Health IT Policy Committee, which advises the federal government on healthcare IT matters.

The HITECH legislation, and the EHR Incentive Program in particular, was the most significant and impactful HIT federal policy in the past decade, Tang said. It was also a necessary enabler for the Affordable Care Act that followed a year later, he added, since health information technology and EHRs are essential to support the transformation required by health reform.

“It’s clear that providers – both physicians and hospitals – cannot undertake the transition from volume to value without knowing their current performance and its costs and without having an electronic infrastructure to effect continuous improvement,” Tang said.

Tang is optimistic. He noted that in just two years time, the number of providers who have achieved meaningful use soared from about 3 percent, pre-HITECH, to more than 60 percent of eligible providers in 2013. Also, more than 80 percent of hospitals have invested in EHRs, he added.

“Yes, we have more work to do as we climb the meaningful use arc towards health information exchange, care coordination and patient engagement required in Stages 2 and 3,” Tang acknowledged. “But the laying down of an electronic infrastructure for the future is a salient milestone that wouldn’t have been possible without HITECH.”

John Halamka, MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

John Halamka, CIO of Beth Israel Medical Center in Boston and a longtime standards guru, tends to focus his attention on the task ahead. But he has been thinking about the past recently.

“When I first became a CIO, my role involved writing applications and managing architecture at a detailed level,” he recalled.

However, over the past 17 years, he said, his role has become much more strategic. He’s had to make sure the right investments were made for BIDMC, that the right architecture was in place and that the resources were there to support it.

“I’ve had to master the political, communication and interpersonal skills of leading rather than the technical skills of being a strong individual IT contributor,” he said.

He’s had to do so, not merely as CIO of one organization, but also in his broader role in the industry. Halamka serves as chairman of the New England Healthcare Exchange Network and co-chair of the Health IT Standards Committee that advises the federal government. He is a full professor at Harvard Medical School, and a practicing emergency physician, not to mention that he and his wife Kathy are building Unity Farm, work that he chronicles regularly on his blog.

The work of the CIO and IT team has grown exponentially over the past 10 years, according to Halamka.

“BIDMC has grown by merger and acquisition requiring transformational IT solutions such as care management applications, population health analytics, community-wide HIE, big data management and mobile enablement for all our stakeholders,” he said.

BIDMC is not unique in finding itself in this position, and some can’t keep up.

“Demand and expectations have exceeded the ability of many IT organizations to keep customers satisfied,” Halamka said.

Scott MacLean, Partners HealthCare

Scott MacLean, deputy CIO and director of IS Operations, at Partners HealthCare in Boston, said he and his colleagues approach their work differently today than 10 years ago.

“We are not arguing that CPOE, electronic medication administration and other EHR functions are efficacious,” he said. “We are busy optimizing and measuring the results of these interventions.”

Just as CIOs and IT teams have changed how they look at their work, so have organizations. At Partners, which is in the midst of an Epic system rollout, MacLean says: “We realized that much of the functionality we developed is available commercially, so we’re adopting a vendor platform and will focus our innovation on genomics and other research discoveries we want to bring to the bedside and clinics.”

As he sees it, collaboration has taken hold across the industry, and interoperability is top of mind.

“In the past, healthcare systems sought to keep their patients’ information and HIT vendors wanted to sell all of their products to a provider, MacLean said. While that may still be the case at times, he said, “policy and payment models are driving collaboration, which will benefit consumers and save money.”

Collaboration is on Ed Ricks’ mind, too. Ricks, vice president and CIO at Beaufort Memorial Hospital in Beaufort, S.C., said, “I think it’s a very different skillset today. We’re collaborators now, working with the medical staff, and I’m trying to make the technology invisible to clinicians, and to open workflows. The technology is so cool right now and nobody has to care about the tech as much as what it does.”

George Hickman, Albany Medical Center

George Hickman, executive vice president and CIO at Albany Medical Center in New York State’s capital city, works as hard as he ever has over the past 10 years, but he has to be more strategic, he said.

“I move as fast as I ever did,” Hickman said, “but I am much more deliberate about priorities. I pay attention to what could be most beneficial, most costly and most risky – in both qualitative and quantitative terms.” This change, he said, is both intuitive and analytical, and it has come with experience.

As was the case with many other health systems across the country over the past 10 years, the biggest change at Albany Medical Center was the implementation of an enterprise-wide electronic health record system, Hickman said, and all the supporting, secure infrastructure and people change expectations.

Hickman foresees many more challenges ahead. “How we understand, use and even exploit our data will be our next ‘EHR-like’ challenge,” he proffered. “I expect that this frontier will take the same sort of time and teaching patience, may be somewhat costly, and will certainly be transformative.”

Harry Greenspun, MD, DeLoitte

“When you think back 10 years, at that time we had an industry way behind others,” said Harry Greenspun, MD, senior advisor at Deloitte’s Center for Health Solutions. “Stimulus and meaningful use gave us that push. It has created a tipping point of EHR adoption, now it’s actually happening and not just among brave innovators but bread-and-butter folks.”

As Greenspun sees it, pretty soon, if you can’t do a lot of simple things, like checking in at the doctor’s office electronically, it will be hard to remain competitive.

“My needs as a patient haven’t changed, but my expectations as a consumer have,” Greenspun said.

Geeta Nayyar, MD, PatientPoint

Call her a poster child for the health IT generation. When Geeta Nayyar, MD, chief medical information officer at PatientPoint, graduated from medical school in 2003, one of the things she looked for in a residency program was that the hospital had some sort of electronic medical record.

“Everything was paper-based – charts, labs, X-rays,” she recalled. She did not want to spend her time prowling around the bowels of a hospital to find patient information, she said.

By the time she started her fellowship, that hospital had a fully integrated EMR.

“We have this whole different ball game today where the EMR is basic and a lot of the graduating students don’t use paper charts,” Nayyar said. “In 10 years, we have come a very long way. It’s not just the infrastructure being laid. Even more important, it’s the application.”

What do you wish had gone differently?

CIOs don’t tend to be a coulda-woulda-shoulda bunch, but they don’t mind engaging in a little Monday-morning quarterbacking now and then. So, what might have gone better in the past 10 years to nudge U.S. healthcare to an even better place on the digital continuum?

“I wish we had made greater progress towards standardization – vocabularies, care practice, etcetera  – and interoperability,” Spooner said. “I wish EMR products had opened to interoperability much farther than has been the case.”

For Halamka, it was without a doubt, “certification and overall program timing.”

“Part of the problem, as I’ve discussed previously, is that the certification criteria are overly burdensome and in many circumstances disconnected from the attestation criteria, requiring very prescriptive features that go beyond the intent of Policy Committee and Standards Committee,” he wrote in a Nov. 27, 2013, blog post, titled “Rethinking Certification.”

In that blog, Halamka discusses the benefits of “agile technology” over “waterfall technology,” which was the method used to derive the regulatory language and certification scripts.

“I’ve spoken with many EHR vendors (to remain unnamed) and all have told me that they created software that will never be used by any clinician but was necessary to check the boxes of certification scripts that make no sense in real world workflows,” he wrote.

In a November 20, 2013, blog post on fine-tuning the healthcare IT timeline, he wrote: “People are working hard. Priority setting is appropriate. Funding is available. The problem is that the scope is too big and the timeline is too short.”

On Dec. 6, 2013, CMS and ONC announced an extension to the meaningful use program.

“Under the revised schedule, Stage 2 would be extended through 2016 and Stage 3 would begin in 2017 for those providers that have completed at least two years in Stage 2,” acting national coordinator Jacob Reider, MD, and Rod Tagalicod, director of the CMS office of health standards and services, announced.

MacLean is on board with all the changes that have been required to move healthcare from a paper-based system to a digital one. But he wishes it could have been accomplished differently.

“I wish the industry could have reformed itself without government intervention and public spending,” he said. “I think it’s unfortunate that the myriad regulations stifle innovation in clinical care and payment models.  Still, we have tipped the fulcrum on HIT adoption and I don’t think we’ll be going back.”

Hickman, at Albany Medical Center, said he wishes “we knew when to understand that something didn’t need to be invented here. We could have done more, and faster.”

Glen TullmanLooking to the future

Glen Tullman, former Allscripts CEO, turned venture capitalist and – as reported in Crain’s Chicago Business – creator of Ignite Glass Studios, a 20,000-square-foot, $5 million glassblowing facility he built in Chicago, continues to be bullish on healthcare IT.

“In the last 10 years, electronic health records have laid the foundation for everything that will change health and healthcare going forward,” he said, “just as computers paved the way for the apps that changed how we do almost everything in the rest of our lives. We’re closer than ever to enabling the intelligent, connected health consumer and, as in other industries, consumers equipped with information, mobility, transparency and access will change everything.”

He recognizes that many challenges remain, but he remains optimistic.

“As for those who point out what’s not working, those are just opportunities for health IT leaders to solve,” he said. “I believe we’re closer than ever to improved outcomes and bending the cost curve in the right direction.”

Spooner envisions a future – perhaps in 10 years – of smooth interoperability.

“Patient information will be interoperable across EMR systems, he said. As he sees it, the patient will be able to transport his full record from provider to provider irrespective of EMR choice. The patient will own the record and will enter/edit his own data to the EMR.

Also, “the U.S. will adopt a uniform patient identifier,” he added.

Compared to 10 years ago, Tang says, “I am more confident that the country will make the necessary paradigm shift from fee-for-service transactional care delivery to one focused on community health and wellbeing now that we are building the necessary information tools to support that transformation.

Denni McColm, CIO at Citizens Memorial Healthcare in Bolivar, Mo., recalls that it was 10 years ago – in December 2003 – that Citizens Memorial eliminated paper medical records.

“At the time, we thought everyone was doing the same thing, but found out over time that others were still just talking about it,” she said. “I’m surprised by how many hospitals still have paper medical records now. I’m thankful we were naïve enough not to know any better back then.”

Mulling it over today, she said, “It did teach us that following what everyone else is doing in IT is not always the best approach.”

Citizens Memorial Healthcare, a 76-bed fully integrated healthcare system, has never let its small size stand in the way of progress. In 2005, it was awarded the prestigious Davies Award from HIMSS, and in 2010, the health system reached Stage 7, the top level, on the HIMSS Analytics EMR Adoption Model scale.

MacLean’s high hope for the next 10 years of healthcare IT is that “we as consumer/patients will engage with the system and hold providers and payers accountable for quality and service.”

As for Halamka, he likens healthcare IT progress to air travel.

“When I became CIO in 1998, it was the Wright Brothers era of healthcare IT – building new technology was an amazing accomplishment,” Halamka said. “Today we’re in the biplane stage – solutions are commercially available but they are not agile or usable. I look forward to the Airbus 380 stage when the technology is safe, convenient, reliable and well engineered for purpose.”

Tang apparently prefers the train analogy.

“The journey, and work, is far from over,” he said, “but with the progress the country has achieved, the train is well out of the station, and we are well on our way towards a more adaptable and rational health system.”

HIMSS Media Executive Editor Tom Sullivan contributed to this article.

Topics: Meaningful use, Electronic Health Record (EHR), Policy and Legislation, Sharp Healthcare, Interoperability, Epic, Cerner, Intermountain Healthcare, James, Brent, Health IT Policy Committee, Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, Affordable Care Act, Health Information Exchange (HIE), Patient Engagement, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), Health IT Standards Committee, Harvard Medical School, Big Data, Partners HealthCare, Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE), Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), Allscripts, Davies Award, , HIMSS analytics, Electronic Medical Record Adoption Model

The Cultural Hurdles Of The Patient-Centered Medical Home – Health IT Outcomes

Posted by timmreardon on 01/16/2014
Posted in: Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Innovation, Patient Centered Medical Home. Leave a comment

Article link: http://www.healthitoutcomes.com/doc/the-cultural-hurdles-of-the-patient-centered-medical-home-0001?sectionCode=Freeform1&templateCode=Single&user=2423280&source=nl:39153

By Ken Congdon, editor-in-chief, Health IT Outcomes

Ken Congdon, Editor In Chief of Health IT Outcomes

Last week, in my column Population Health Management Proves HIT’s Worth, I highlighted how Northeast Georgia Physicians Group (NGPG) and its patients are benefitting from a population analytics toolset that was included as part of a TransforMED grant the provider received from The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI). This grant was awarded to fund NGPG’s transition to a Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH). A PCMH is a model of care developed by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) that emphasizes care coordination and communication. In a set of standards that describe clear and specific criteria, the program gives practices information about organizing care around patients, working in teams, and coordinating and tracking care over time.

To NGPG, the biggest challenges in its PCMH transition haven’t been technological or procedural in nature — they’ve been cultural. Physicians and patients have both had a tough time adjusting to this new method of delivering care.

“A PCMH requires you to move from a physician-centric practice to one that places the patient at the center,” says Dr. Antonio Rios, chief physician executive at NGPG. “In this model, a clinical team provides care to a patient instead of one specific doctor. This transition has not been easy for many of our physicians. Doctors are autonomous and independent creatures. They aren’t used to consulting a team for patient care.”

While the PCMH model has taken some getting used to by NGPG physicians, Dr. Rios stresses that patient care has been much more effective because of team participation. “We’ve been jumping over PCMH hurdles for a couple of years now and it’s gotten to the point where I can’t remember how I provided care without consulting my staff,” he says. “If there’s a day where a meeting or something interferes with my daily team huddles, I feel incomplete. I’m constantly searching for ways to ensure I consult with my team before researching or treating patients.”

Dr. Rios explains that patients have also had some PCMH-related growing pains. “Patients are comfortable in a world where they have a one-to-one relationship with their doctor,” he says. “Patients have placed all of their trust in a single PCP. This needs to change. A PCP needs to be involved in patient care, but he or she doesn’t necessarily be the one delivering it. For example, if a patient has a cold, a PA or RN may actually be a better option to deliver care because of the time they can dedicate to each individual.”

NGPG believes proper education is essential to making patients comfortable with a PCMH transition. Dr. Rios, for example, has had success introducing his team members (i.e. PAs, RNs, etc.) to patients during office visits and gradually involving them in care delivery. This process has helped patients become comfortable with these new caregivers and gain trust in their clinical abilities.

Have a Tricare Problem? Fix it Online – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 01/15/2014
Posted in: Healthcare Delivery, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Mobile Healthcare. Leave a comment

Image

Article link: http://www.nextgov.com/defense/whats-brewin/2014/01/have-tricare-problem-fix-it-online/76841/?oref=nextgov_today_nl

That’s the message the 9.7 million beneficiaries of the TRICARE insurance plan got from the Defense Department, which announced it will no longer offer live, walk-in service to handle administrative issues as of April 1, when all such queries will be managed online or by phone.

TRICARE insurance carriers operate walk-in centers at 189 military hospitals or clinics. Half of visits to the centers are for in- and out-processing and requests to change primary care providers, and the rest involve billing-related questions.

Army Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman said, “The change will not – let me repeat that – will not affect any TRICARE medical benefit or health care service.” On the other hand, the move will cut the cost of running the centers — currently some $50 million a year. Warren said customers who need the type of assistance they receive at the the walk-in service centers can quickly and efficiently get help online or via phone.

That’s the message the 9.7 million beneficiaries of the TRICARE insurance plan got from the Defense Department, which announced it will no longer offer live, walk-in service to handle administrative issues as of April 1, when all such queries will be managed online or by phone.

TRICARE insurance carriers operate walk-in centers at 189 military hospitals or clinics. Half of visits to the centers are for in- and out-processing and requests to change primary care providers, and the rest involve billing-related questions.

Army Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman said, “The change will not – let me repeat that – will not affect any TRICARE medical benefit or health care service.” On the other hand, the move will cut the cost of running the centers — currently some $50 million a year. Warren said customers who need the type of assistance they receive at the the walk-in service centers can quickly and efficiently get help online or via phone.

Tricare.mil currently averages about 38,000 hits per day, and officials have run tests to ensure the website and call center can handle the expected increase in volume.

Get the Nextgov iPhone app to keep up with government technology news.

(Image via Pavel Ignatov/Shutterstock.com)

Bob Brewin joined Government Executive in April 2007, bringing with him more than 20 years of experience as a journalist focusing on defense issues and technology. Bob covers the world of defense and information technology for Nextgov, and is the author of the “What’s Brewin” blog.

Healthcare sector to test reflexes for cyber attack – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 01/15/2014
Posted in: Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Security. Leave a comment

nextgov-medium 3

The health sector, in partnership with the federal government, will conduct simulated attacks against health care networks this spring to test their vulnerability to hackers, industry officials announced on Monday.

The simulation, scheduled for March, marks the first time insurers, hospitals, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and the Health and Human Services Department will run a fire drill in concert. Health care has been named one of 17 critical infrastructure sectors that, if disrupted by a cyberattack, could have far-reaching consequences for the nation.

HHS Chief Information Security Officer Kevin Charest said in a statement, “Our goal for the exercises is to identify additional ways that we can help the industry be better prepared for and better able to respond to cyberattacks. This exercise will generate valuable information we can use to improve our joint preparedness.”

It is unclear whether the event will test the reflexes of HealthCare.gov, the problem-plagued online health insurance exchange developed by the Obama administration under the Affordable Care Act.

The Health Information Trust Alliance, a medical information technology advocacy group, will coordinate the event.

The medical industry already suffers from data breaches that have jeopardized patient privacy and facilitated fraud. According to a 2012 Ponemon Institute study, 94 percent of health care organizations experienced at least one data breach during the previous two years.

The aim of this spring’s simulated hacking exercise, dubbed CyberRX, is to discover weaknesses in preparedness and spot areas where information sharing could be improved.

HITRUST has stood up an incident response center that circulates intelligence about threats among industry specialists, as well as HHS and Homeland Security Department officials. The March drill is partly aimed at determining the efficiency of that model.

Participants will include Children’s Medical Center Dallas, CVS Caremark and Express Scripts, as well as numerous insurance providers including Health Care Service Corp., Humana, UnitedHealth Group, and WellPoint.

A second experiment is planned for this summer.

“As cyber threats continue to increase and the number of attacks targeted at healthcare organizations rise, industry organizations are seeking useful and actionable information with guidance that augments their existing information security programs without duplication or complication,” HITRUST Chief Executive Officer Daniel Nutkis said in a statement. “CyberRX will undoubtedly provide invaluable information that can be used by organizations to refine their information protection programs.”

The healthcare industry is not the first critical infrastructure sector to check its cyber hygiene.

Last November, in California, almost 10,000 electrical engineers, cybersecurity specialists, utility executives and FBI agents spent 48 hours with a fake adversary who tried to turn out the lights across America, the New York Times reported. The previous month, the financial sector ran a simulation — its second since 2011 — called “Quantum Dawn 2” that showed resiliency but also areas where the industry can do better, according to USA Today. The six-hour trial run herded more than 500 people and more than 50 organizations, including Wall Street banks, stock exchanges, utilities, DHS, the FBI and the Treasury Department.

(Image via Maksim Kabakou/Shutterstock.com)

Op-Ed: Open Data Policy Has Far-Reaching Implications for Health Care – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 01/14/2014
Posted in: Global Standards, Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Innovation, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Open Data. Leave a comment

nextgov-medium2

Article link: http://www.nextgov.com/health/health-it/2014/01/op-ed-open-data-policy-has-far-reaching-implications-health-care/76670/?oref=nextgov_healthit_nl

In May 2013, the Office of Management and Budget released an executive order that requires federal agencies to use machine-readable and open formats — in addition to data standards and other regulations — for creating and collecting information. This new policy will have a significant impact on how public and private organizations access and leverage information. It will also help build a foundation for easily sharing health data in the future.

How do open formats support interoperability? The concept isn’t all that different from what occurred in the early days of rail travel. Two centuries ago, most U.S. railroad companies used their own track gauges when building rail lines. Although this kept their railways proprietary, it also required companies to lay tracks where others might already exist, which was both inefficient and costly. Through consolidation and other partnerships, railways eventually standardized the track gauge, leading to a more collaborative, practical and efficient use of existing railways.

Just as “standard gauge” evolved to enable interconnectedness throughout the railway system, the new regulations requiring agencies to use data standards as well as machine-readable and open formats will help organizations access and leverage data more efficiently. Through the use of open data, for instance, well-documented schemas and interface definitions will establish the groundwork for easier access to information that can be used for analytical, research or commercial purposes. Likewise, this evolution will spur the development of new products and ultimately a vibrant product ecosystem.

By establishing standards at these levels, the government is helping organizations communicate more effectively. Essentially, it is laying the tracks for interoperability.

Implications for Health Care

Although the OMB executive order applies across different industries, there are specific implications for health care. In a nutshell, the requirements mean that key data will be more readily accessible and usable for analysis and research, in addition to other innovative purposes such as commercial development.

It is important to note that this policy applies to both public agencies and private organizations that communicate with public agencies. Therefore, organizations such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the Defense Health Agency, the Veterans Health Administration and others must comply along with any hospital, health system or provider that share information with them.

Consider the Veterans Affairs and Defense departments. They provide care but they also purchase care from private practitioners for military personnel and veterans when necessary. In these cases, the private providers that work with the VA and Defense must follow the same standards as the federal agencies. Because these private providers must rise to meet the government’s requirements, they are likely to continue using the standards with their commercial partners as well.

The government’s new policy has a direct impact on how most health care organizations –public and private — will send, receive and manage their data. With the public and private sectors working collaboratively to identify effective data standards and formats, the health care industry as a whole is getting one step closer to connecting its tracks and improving widespread interoperability.

Viet Nguyen, M.D., is the chief medical information officer at Systems Made Simple, Inc., a leading provider of IT systems and services to support critical architecture, data and application challenges in the healthcare industry. Rob Sax is the chief technology officer at SMS.

(Image via Tashatuvango/Shutterstock.com)

The Navy Fast Tracked Its Record Scanning System Over the Holidays – Nextgov

Posted by timmreardon on 01/14/2014
Posted in: Health Care Costs, Health Care Economics, Health Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Integrated Electronic Health Records, Quality Measures, U.S. Navy Medicine. Leave a comment

Article link:nextgov-medium1 http://www.nextgov.com/defense/2014/01/navy-fast-tracked-record-scanning-system-over-holidays/76553/?oref=nextgov_healthit_nl

The Navy scrambled last month to meet a deadline for scanning and electronically transferring service treatment records to the Veterans Affairs Department by the start of 2014. The process involved an interim sole source contract and system tests during the last two weeks of December and into the New Year, Nextgov has learned.

The $5 million, 18-month sole source contract, awarded Dec. 19 to Anacomp Inc. of Chantilly, Va., calls for the company to scan 7,000 treatment records per month for discharged Navy and Marine personnel, with 13 million individual pages to be scanned in the first year of the contract.

VA and the Defense Department agreed in February that Defense would be bulk scanning all such treatment records by Dec. 31 for electronic transfer to VA.

A service treatment record contains all medical information on an active duty service member, from his or her first physical examination upon entering service through their final physical before discharge from service, along with clinical notes on all consultations and treatments received in the interim. VA needs complete treatment records to evaluate disability claims. Currently it takes the department 125 days to retrieve STRs from Defense, extending the time required to process a claim.

Navy hospitals and clinics will pack and mail the treatment records to Anacomp, rather than to the Navy Bureau of Medicine, or BUMED, surgery site in St. Louis — which is co-located with the VA National Records Center — as originally planned, a BUMED spokesman told Nextgov.

The Anacomp contract is only an interim, short-term solution while BUMED develops a long-term contract, the Navy Fleet Logistics Center disclosed in a Nov. 3 justification for that contract. BUMED started work on the requirement to digitize service treatment records in May 2013, a move the Fleet Logistics Center described as a “complex challenge.”

The project has had to “at a minimum, develop the integrated processes between the Navy and VA, define the business rules associated with those processes, determine the required infrastructure (building space, scanners, etc.), resolve security issues, and assess the IT solution necessary” to meet the January deadline for electronic transfer of treatment records to VA.

Since treatment records contain protected personal and health information, anyone handling those records needs to have completed a National Agency Check with Law and Credit, a security clearance process, and the contractor must adhere to federal standards for handling such information, the Fleet Logistics Center said.

To ensure BUMED oversight,  the scanning facility needed to be located in the Washington area, as BUMED has limited travel funds. Only Anacomp, which already scans benefits claims for VA, met all these requirements, the Fleet Logistics Center said.

The Navy required a secure website be built to manage and track shipments of records.  Each and every digitized page of an individual record must also include metadata identifiers – first and last names and social security numbers – to locate them after they are scanned into the Healthcare Artifact and Image Management Solution, or HAIMS, which was originally developed to store, manage and provide access to medical imagery, and now is used by Defense to transfer records to VA.

Paul Ross, a BUMED spokesman, said the command had set up a “tiger team” that developed a scanning solution and a HAIMS interface, which were shared with Anacomp after the contract award. Ross said the Navy was also able to leverage processes set up by Anacomp to ensure scanned images can be viewed by VA.

After the award, the agencies spent two weeks performing test scans with the contractor, and scanned images were successfully uploaded into HAIMS, including the metadata test, Ross said. The secure website to track shipments was also set up in that time frame, and quality of scanning and metadata was tested by HAIMS engineers, he added.

As of Jan. 1, all treatment records for Navy and Marine personnel separating or retiring are sent to Anacomp, and the company is ready to scan the records.

Pentagon spokeswomen for the Defense Health Agency have not responded to a mid-December query and a follow up on Jan. 3 about whether or not the Army and Air Force are in compliance with the agreement to electronically transfer service treatment records to VA as of this January. The Fleet Logistics Center contract justification document said, “Both the Army and Air Force are establishing central cells near the VA site in St. Louis where contractors will provide scanning services.”

Posts navigation

← Older Entries
Newer Entries →
  • Search site

  • Follow healthcarereimagined on WordPress.com
  • Recent Posts

    • The Global Healthcare System Is Broken. Japan Fixed It for $4,100 Per Person. 04/10/2026
    • When Not to Use AI – MIT Sloan 04/01/2026
    • There are more AI health tools than ever—but how well do they work? – MIT Technology Review 03/30/2026
    • Are AI Tools Ready to Answer Patients’ Questions About Their Medical Care? – JAMA 03/27/2026
    • How AI use in scholarly publishing threatens research integrity, lessens trust, and invites misinformation – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 03/25/2026
    • VA Prepares April Relaunch of EHR Program – GovCIO 03/19/2026
    • Strong call for universal healthcare from Pope Leo today – FAN 03/18/2026
    • EHR fragmentation offers an opportunity to enhance care coordination and experience 03/16/2026
    • When AI Governance Fails 03/15/2026
    • Introduction: Disinformation as a multiplier of existential threat – Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 03/12/2026
  • Categories

    • Accountable Care Organizations
    • ACOs
    • AHRQ
    • American Board of Internal Medicine
    • Big Data
    • Blue Button
    • Board Certification
    • Cancer Treatment
    • Data Science
    • Digital Services Playbook
    • DoD
    • EHR Interoperability
    • EHR Usability
    • Emergency Medicine
    • FDA
    • FDASIA
    • GAO Reports
    • Genetic Data
    • Genetic Research
    • Genomic Data
    • Global Standards
    • Health Care Costs
    • Health Care Economics
    • Health IT adoption
    • Health Outcomes
    • Healthcare Delivery
    • Healthcare Informatics
    • Healthcare Outcomes
    • Healthcare Security
    • Helathcare Delivery
    • HHS
    • HIPAA
    • ICD-10
    • Innovation
    • Integrated Electronic Health Records
    • IT Acquisition
    • JASONS
    • Lab Report Access
    • Military Health System Reform
    • Mobile Health
    • Mobile Healthcare
    • National Health IT System
    • NSF
    • ONC Reports to Congress
    • Oncology
    • Open Data
    • Patient Centered Medical Home
    • Patient Portals
    • PCMH
    • Precision Medicine
    • Primary Care
    • Public Health
    • Quadruple Aim
    • Quality Measures
    • Rehab Medicine
    • TechFAR Handbook
    • Triple Aim
    • U.S. Air Force Medicine
    • U.S. Army
    • U.S. Army Medicine
    • U.S. Navy Medicine
    • U.S. Surgeon General
    • Uncategorized
    • Value-based Care
    • Veterans Affairs
    • Warrior Transistion Units
    • XPRIZE
  • Archives

    • April 2026 (2)
    • March 2026 (9)
    • February 2026 (6)
    • January 2026 (8)
    • December 2025 (11)
    • November 2025 (9)
    • October 2025 (10)
    • September 2025 (4)
    • August 2025 (7)
    • July 2025 (2)
    • June 2025 (9)
    • May 2025 (4)
    • April 2025 (11)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • February 2025 (10)
    • January 2025 (12)
    • December 2024 (12)
    • November 2024 (7)
    • October 2024 (5)
    • September 2024 (9)
    • August 2024 (10)
    • July 2024 (13)
    • June 2024 (18)
    • May 2024 (10)
    • April 2024 (19)
    • March 2024 (35)
    • February 2024 (23)
    • January 2024 (16)
    • December 2023 (22)
    • November 2023 (38)
    • October 2023 (24)
    • September 2023 (24)
    • August 2023 (34)
    • July 2023 (33)
    • June 2023 (30)
    • May 2023 (35)
    • April 2023 (30)
    • March 2023 (30)
    • February 2023 (15)
    • January 2023 (17)
    • December 2022 (10)
    • November 2022 (7)
    • October 2022 (22)
    • September 2022 (16)
    • August 2022 (33)
    • July 2022 (28)
    • June 2022 (42)
    • May 2022 (53)
    • April 2022 (35)
    • March 2022 (37)
    • February 2022 (21)
    • January 2022 (28)
    • December 2021 (23)
    • November 2021 (12)
    • October 2021 (10)
    • September 2021 (4)
    • August 2021 (4)
    • July 2021 (4)
    • May 2021 (3)
    • April 2021 (1)
    • March 2021 (2)
    • February 2021 (1)
    • January 2021 (4)
    • December 2020 (7)
    • November 2020 (2)
    • October 2020 (4)
    • September 2020 (7)
    • August 2020 (11)
    • July 2020 (3)
    • June 2020 (5)
    • April 2020 (3)
    • March 2020 (1)
    • February 2020 (1)
    • January 2020 (2)
    • December 2019 (2)
    • November 2019 (1)
    • September 2019 (4)
    • August 2019 (3)
    • July 2019 (5)
    • June 2019 (10)
    • May 2019 (8)
    • April 2019 (6)
    • March 2019 (7)
    • February 2019 (17)
    • January 2019 (14)
    • December 2018 (10)
    • November 2018 (20)
    • October 2018 (14)
    • September 2018 (27)
    • August 2018 (19)
    • July 2018 (16)
    • June 2018 (18)
    • May 2018 (28)
    • April 2018 (3)
    • March 2018 (11)
    • February 2018 (5)
    • January 2018 (10)
    • December 2017 (20)
    • November 2017 (30)
    • October 2017 (33)
    • September 2017 (11)
    • August 2017 (13)
    • July 2017 (9)
    • June 2017 (8)
    • May 2017 (9)
    • April 2017 (4)
    • March 2017 (12)
    • December 2016 (3)
    • September 2016 (4)
    • August 2016 (1)
    • July 2016 (7)
    • June 2016 (7)
    • April 2016 (4)
    • March 2016 (7)
    • February 2016 (1)
    • January 2016 (3)
    • November 2015 (3)
    • October 2015 (2)
    • September 2015 (9)
    • August 2015 (6)
    • June 2015 (5)
    • May 2015 (6)
    • April 2015 (3)
    • March 2015 (16)
    • February 2015 (10)
    • January 2015 (16)
    • December 2014 (9)
    • November 2014 (7)
    • October 2014 (21)
    • September 2014 (8)
    • August 2014 (9)
    • July 2014 (7)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (8)
    • April 2014 (19)
    • March 2014 (8)
    • February 2014 (9)
    • January 2014 (31)
    • December 2013 (23)
    • November 2013 (48)
    • October 2013 (25)
  • Tags

    Business Defense Department Department of Veterans Affairs EHealth EHR Electronic health record Food and Drug Administration Health Health informatics Health Information Exchange Health information technology Health system HIE Hospital IBM Mayo Clinic Medicare Medicine Military Health System Patient Patient portal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act United States United States Department of Defense United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Upcoming Events

Blog at WordPress.com.
healthcarereimagined
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • healthcarereimagined
    • Join 153 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • healthcarereimagined
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...