healthcarereimagined

Envisioning healthcare for the 21st century

  • About
  • Economics

How organizations build a culture of AI ethics – MIT Sloan Management

Posted by timmreardon on 11/19/2025
Posted in: Uncategorized.


by

Kristin Burnham

 Apr 8, 2025

Why It Matters

From risk management policies to the five stages of AI ethics, here’s how some organizations approach ethical AI. Share 

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing industries, by automating customer service, optimizing supply chains, personalizing marketing campaigns, and in countless other ways. But with great power comes great responsibility — and risks. 

Organizations today must work to ensure that the AI systems they build or implement are safe, secure, unbiased, and transparent, according to Thomas Davenport, a Babson University professor and visiting scholar at the MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy. 

During a recent webinar hosted by MIT Sloan Management Review, Davenport highlighted a number of ethical risks that AI can introduce to businesses. These include algorithmic bias in machine learning, varying levels of model transparency, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and the possibility that AI will serve users insensitive or inappropriate content. Organizations must also contend with whether AI will deliver useful results. 

To counteract these risks, organizations need to embed ethical practices into AI solutions from the start, Davenport said. They also need to ensure that teams and individuals are engaged in ethical AI as a part of their everyday work. 

Here’s a look at several responsible AI strategies that organizations are using today and how businesses can progress from discussing AI ethics to taking action. 

AI strategies at Unilever and Scotiabank 

Companies are adopting a variety of strategies to integrate AI ethics into their operations, Davenport said, including appointing heads of AI ethics, performing research about the topic, conducting beta testing, and using external assessors to evaluate use cases.

Consumer packaged goods company Unilever, for example, created an AI assurance function that examines each new AI application to determine its risk level in terms of both effectiveness and ethics, Davenport said. This process requires individuals who propose a use case to fill out a questionnaire. An AI-based application then determines whether the use case is likely to be approved or whether there are underlying problems with the use case. This process ensures that AI models are aligned with ethical guidelines before deployment. 

Scotiabank developed an AI risk management policy and a data ethics team to advance a data ethics policy, Davenport said. The policies are part of the Canadian bank’s code of conduct, which all employees must agree to follow each year. The company also requires mandatory data ethics education for all employees working in the customer insights, data, and analytics organization or on other analytics teams. Scotiabank also worked with Deloitte to develop an automated ethics assistant — similar to Unilever’s — that reviews each use case before its deployed. The bank also involves employees in managing unstructured data to determine the most effective answers to customer questions.

“[This] kind of democratization of the process is important not only to your ethics, but also to your productivity as an organization in getting these systems up and running,” Davenport said.

5 stages of AI ethics

Davenport identified five stages that play crucial roles in fostering ethical AI development, deployment, and use within organizations. As companies advance through the stages, they move from talk to action, he noted. 

  1. Evangelism. In this stage, representatives of the company speak internally and externally about the importance of AI ethics.
  2. Policies. The company deliberates on and approves a set of corporate policies to ensure ethical approaches to AI are established.
  3. Documentation. The company records data on each AI use case. This could include the use of model cards, which explain how models were designed to be used and how they have been evaluated.
  4. Review. The company performs or sponsors a systematic review of each use case to determine whether it meets the company’s criteria for responsible AI.
  5. Action. The company develops a process whereby each use case is either accepted as is, returned to the proposing owner for revision, or rejected.

Davenport said that it’s important for organizations to make strategic plans for integrating ethics into their AI strategy. “What use cases might make sense for us? We develop a model, we deploy the model, we monitor the model, and ethics come into place throughout that entire process,” he said. “That’s what the most successful organizations do with regard to AI ethics.”  

WATCH THE WEBINAR: HOW TO BUILD AN ETHICAL AI CULTURE

Article link: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-organizations-build-a-culture-ai-ethics?

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
Like Loading...

Related

Posts navigation

← AI crawler wars threaten to make the web more closed for everyone – MIT Technology Review
Disconnected Systems Lead to Disconnected Care →
  • Search site

  • Follow healthcarereimagined on WordPress.com
  • Recent Posts

    • Disconnected Systems Lead to Disconnected Care 11/26/2025
    • How organizations build a culture of AI ethics – MIT Sloan Management 11/19/2025
    • AI crawler wars threaten to make the web more closed for everyone – MIT Technology Review 11/19/2025
    • IBM CEO predicts quantum computing breakthrough in 3-5 years | Karl Haller 11/15/2025
    • The Quantum Mirage 11/15/2025
    • New MIT report captures state of quantum computing – MIT Sloan Management 11/15/2025
    • Why AI for good depends on good data – Amazon Science 11/12/2025
    • Are hospitals and health systems really ready for AI? – Healthcare IT News 11/08/2025
    • Make no mistake—AI is owned by Big Tech – MIT Technology Review 10/30/2025
    • AI implementation strategies: 4 insights from MIT Sloan Management Review 10/30/2025
  • Categories

    • Accountable Care Organizations
    • ACOs
    • AHRQ
    • American Board of Internal Medicine
    • Big Data
    • Blue Button
    • Board Certification
    • Cancer Treatment
    • Data Science
    • Digital Services Playbook
    • DoD
    • EHR Interoperability
    • EHR Usability
    • Emergency Medicine
    • FDA
    • FDASIA
    • GAO Reports
    • Genetic Data
    • Genetic Research
    • Genomic Data
    • Global Standards
    • Health Care Costs
    • Health Care Economics
    • Health IT adoption
    • Health Outcomes
    • Healthcare Delivery
    • Healthcare Informatics
    • Healthcare Outcomes
    • Healthcare Security
    • Helathcare Delivery
    • HHS
    • HIPAA
    • ICD-10
    • Innovation
    • Integrated Electronic Health Records
    • IT Acquisition
    • JASONS
    • Lab Report Access
    • Military Health System Reform
    • Mobile Health
    • Mobile Healthcare
    • National Health IT System
    • NSF
    • ONC Reports to Congress
    • Oncology
    • Open Data
    • Patient Centered Medical Home
    • Patient Portals
    • PCMH
    • Precision Medicine
    • Primary Care
    • Public Health
    • Quadruple Aim
    • Quality Measures
    • Rehab Medicine
    • TechFAR Handbook
    • Triple Aim
    • U.S. Air Force Medicine
    • U.S. Army
    • U.S. Army Medicine
    • U.S. Navy Medicine
    • U.S. Surgeon General
    • Uncategorized
    • Value-based Care
    • Veterans Affairs
    • Warrior Transistion Units
    • XPRIZE
  • Archives

    • November 2025 (8)
    • October 2025 (10)
    • September 2025 (4)
    • August 2025 (7)
    • July 2025 (2)
    • June 2025 (9)
    • May 2025 (4)
    • April 2025 (11)
    • March 2025 (11)
    • February 2025 (10)
    • January 2025 (12)
    • December 2024 (12)
    • November 2024 (7)
    • October 2024 (5)
    • September 2024 (9)
    • August 2024 (10)
    • July 2024 (13)
    • June 2024 (18)
    • May 2024 (10)
    • April 2024 (19)
    • March 2024 (35)
    • February 2024 (23)
    • January 2024 (16)
    • December 2023 (22)
    • November 2023 (38)
    • October 2023 (24)
    • September 2023 (24)
    • August 2023 (34)
    • July 2023 (33)
    • June 2023 (30)
    • May 2023 (35)
    • April 2023 (30)
    • March 2023 (30)
    • February 2023 (15)
    • January 2023 (17)
    • December 2022 (10)
    • November 2022 (7)
    • October 2022 (22)
    • September 2022 (16)
    • August 2022 (33)
    • July 2022 (28)
    • June 2022 (42)
    • May 2022 (53)
    • April 2022 (35)
    • March 2022 (37)
    • February 2022 (21)
    • January 2022 (28)
    • December 2021 (23)
    • November 2021 (12)
    • October 2021 (10)
    • September 2021 (4)
    • August 2021 (4)
    • July 2021 (4)
    • May 2021 (3)
    • April 2021 (1)
    • March 2021 (2)
    • February 2021 (1)
    • January 2021 (4)
    • December 2020 (7)
    • November 2020 (2)
    • October 2020 (4)
    • September 2020 (7)
    • August 2020 (11)
    • July 2020 (3)
    • June 2020 (5)
    • April 2020 (3)
    • March 2020 (1)
    • February 2020 (1)
    • January 2020 (2)
    • December 2019 (2)
    • November 2019 (1)
    • September 2019 (4)
    • August 2019 (3)
    • July 2019 (5)
    • June 2019 (10)
    • May 2019 (8)
    • April 2019 (6)
    • March 2019 (7)
    • February 2019 (17)
    • January 2019 (14)
    • December 2018 (10)
    • November 2018 (20)
    • October 2018 (14)
    • September 2018 (27)
    • August 2018 (19)
    • July 2018 (16)
    • June 2018 (18)
    • May 2018 (28)
    • April 2018 (3)
    • March 2018 (11)
    • February 2018 (5)
    • January 2018 (10)
    • December 2017 (20)
    • November 2017 (30)
    • October 2017 (33)
    • September 2017 (11)
    • August 2017 (13)
    • July 2017 (9)
    • June 2017 (8)
    • May 2017 (9)
    • April 2017 (4)
    • March 2017 (12)
    • December 2016 (3)
    • September 2016 (4)
    • August 2016 (1)
    • July 2016 (7)
    • June 2016 (7)
    • April 2016 (4)
    • March 2016 (7)
    • February 2016 (1)
    • January 2016 (3)
    • November 2015 (3)
    • October 2015 (2)
    • September 2015 (9)
    • August 2015 (6)
    • June 2015 (5)
    • May 2015 (6)
    • April 2015 (3)
    • March 2015 (16)
    • February 2015 (10)
    • January 2015 (16)
    • December 2014 (9)
    • November 2014 (7)
    • October 2014 (21)
    • September 2014 (8)
    • August 2014 (9)
    • July 2014 (7)
    • June 2014 (5)
    • May 2014 (8)
    • April 2014 (19)
    • March 2014 (8)
    • February 2014 (9)
    • January 2014 (31)
    • December 2013 (23)
    • November 2013 (48)
    • October 2013 (25)
  • Tags

    Business Defense Department Department of Veterans Affairs EHealth EHR Electronic health record Food and Drug Administration Health Health informatics Health Information Exchange Health information technology Health system HIE Hospital IBM Mayo Clinic Medicare Medicine Military Health System Patient Patient portal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act United States United States Department of Defense United States Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Upcoming Events

Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • healthcarereimagined
    • Join 155 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • healthcarereimagined
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d